On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:16:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> + bool enable_filter,
> >> + unsigned pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS])
> >
> > Passing the whole array as an argument instead of only a pointer to it?
>
> This is C, and not
Em 04-05-2012 06:52, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:16:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
+ bool enable_filter,
+ unsigned pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS])
>>>
>>> Passing the whole array as an argument instead o
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:16:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> edac: Change internal representation to work with layers
>
> From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
> Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow
> based memory controllers.
>
> There are lots of those memory con
Em 04-05-2012 07:16, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:16:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> edac: Change internal representation to work with layers
...
>> /**
>> - * edac_mc_alloc: Allocate a struct mem_ctl_info structure
>> - * @size_pvt: size of private stor
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> > so its not like new tasks will ever get this cpu set in
> > +* their mm mask. -- Peter Zijlstra
> > +* Thus, we may use rcu_read_lock() here, instead of grabbing
> > +* full-fledged tasklist_lock.
> > +*/
This patch adds more comments on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask, plus adds
a runtime check: the function is only suitable for offlined CPUs,
and if called inappropriately, the kernel should scream aloud.
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov
---
On Tue
