On Mar 22, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Kent Yoder wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
>> Is there a reason this isn't in drivers/crypto/
>
> Other arch-specific dirs have their crypto subdir as well such as
> arch/s390. I was just matching that.
>
> Kent
>
>> - k
>
>From what I can tell this isn't ISA level instr
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:16:41 -0800
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > The bug looks pretty generic, nothing very PPC-specific there. It
> > might affect other architectures - we won't know until we find out
> > wht caused it.
>
> well one half of t
On 3/23/2012 12:22 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:16:41 -0800
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> The bug looks pretty generic, nothing very PPC-specific there. It
>>> might affect other architectures - we won't know until we
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> The following changes since commit
> 4f262acfde22b63498b5e4f165e53d3bb4e96400:
>
> Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.linaro.org/people/rmk/linux-arm
> (2012-03-07 08:33:03 -0800)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.ker
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> There are some merge conflicts. Hope attached patch could help Linus a
> little bit.
Hmm. My merge does not agree with yours at all in the MIPS
pcibios_fixup_bus() area.
Your patch re-introduces the device resource fixup that Bjorn removed,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> There are some merge conflicts. Hope attached patch could help Linus a
>> little bit.
>
> Hmm. My merge does not agree with yours at all in the MIPS
> pcibios_fixup_bus() area.
>
> Y
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung dma-mapping-next
>
> Those patches introduce a new alloc method (with support for memory
> attributes) in dma_map_ops structure, which will later replace
> dma_alloc_coherent and dma_a
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 12:24 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> well yeah, PPC is throwing things in the spanner
>
> we're now working on an x86-only patch with basically the same
> improvement, but done in a way that does not touch the other
> architectures
>
> so by all means drop the patch
Or ma
