On 03/08/2012 05:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> It would probably be easiest if all these patches were merged via the
> powerpc tree to eliminate any dependencies between them. Their impact on
> generic code is very small.
Go ahead, no point in doing otherwise.
--
Jens Axboe
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:39:31 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The PowerPC legacy iSeries platform is being removed so this is no
> longer selectable.
Fine by me
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
>
> > + if ((fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548) || fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548_E)) &&
>
> Should this also have 8547, 8547E, 8545, 8545E, 8543, & 8543E?
Yes. I will include these chips.
-Chenhui
>
> > + !early_find_capability(hose, 0, 0, PCI
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:12:33PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
When running inside a virtual machine, we can not modify timebase, so
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:28:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This series of patches removes all the legacy iSeries platform specific
> drivers (and the iSeries specific part of one). The legacy iSeries
> platform main code has already bee removed along with CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES,
On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood wrote:
Again, for 85xx we should *never* sync the timebase in the kernel,
hypervisor
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood wrote:
> Again, for 85xx we shoul
On 03/08/2012 12:24 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 02.03.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 12:24 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:09:47AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> There's always a chance we're unable to read a guest instruction. The guest
> could have its TLB mapped execute-, but not readable, something odd happens
> and our TLB gets flushed. So it's a good idea to be prepared for that case
>
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 16:52 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Mikey,
> >
> > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ.
> > >
>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:35:46AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Actually, I didn't keep MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, I kept HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. If
> I remove it, then I get Kconfig warnings:
>
> warning: (PPC) selects SPARSE_IRQ which has unmet direct dependencies
> (HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS && HAVE_S
Hi Jesse,
Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c between commit 8ee3e0d69623
("powerpc: Remove the main legacy iSerie platform code") from the powerpc
tree and commit 673c97562489 ("powerpc/PCI: replace pci_probe_only with
pci_flags") from t
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/iseries_veth.c between commit e92a665949f6
("net: powerpc: remove the legacy iSeries ethernet driver") from the
powerpc tree and commit 41de8d4cff21 ("drivers/net: Remove alloc_etherdev
error messages"
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:39 +, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:35:46AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Actually, I didn't keep MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, I kept HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. If
> > I remove it, then I get Kconfig warnings:
> >
> > warning: (PPC) selects SPARSE_IRQ which
This patch consists of:
- Enable PCI MSI as default for Bluestone board
- Define number of MSI interrupt for Maui APM821xx SoC using in Bluestone board
- Fix returning ENODEV as finding MSI node
- Fix MSI physical high and low address
- Keep MSI data logically
Signed-off-by: Mai La
---
arch/powe
Signed-off-by: Mai La
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts | 24
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts
index 2a56a0d..8ea6325 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/blue
Hi,
I'm seeing this on a POWER7 blade booting 3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308:
PCI host bridge to bus :00
pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0x10-0x10] (bus address
[0xf-0xf])
pci_bus :00: root bus resource [mem 0x3b00-0x3b001fff] (bus
address [0xe00
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 14:25 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing this on a POWER7 blade booting 3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308:
Looks like something that got fixed but the new patches from Bjorn
aren't in next yet. I'll fwd you the patch separately to apply on top
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:17 +0700, Mai La wrote:
> This patch consists of:
> - Enable PCI MSI as default for Bluestone board
> - Define number of MSI interrupt for Maui APM821xx SoC using in Bluestone
> board
> - Fix returning ENODEV as finding MSI node
> - Fix MSI physical high and low address
>
Hi Ben,
> Looks like something that got fixed but the new patches from Bjorn
> aren't in next yet. I'll fwd you the patch separately to apply on top
> of what you have see if that helps (to confirm that's indeed the
> issue).
Thanks, confirmed that it fixes it. Patch below in case anyone else is
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/setup.c between commit 8ee3e0d69623
("powerpc: Remove the main legacy iSerie platform code") from the powerpc
tree and commit bd2f55361f18 ("sched/rt: Use schedule_preempt_disabled()")
from the tip tr
Hi Greg,
Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
drivers/base/driver.c between commit fcd6f7620202 ("driver-core: remove
legacy iSeries hack") from the powerpc tree and commit 9875bb480cc8
("Eliminate get_driver() and put_driver()") from the driver-core tree.
Just conte
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:36:46 +1100
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/iseries_veth.c between commit e92a665949f6
> ("net: powerpc: remove the legacy iSeries ethernet driver") from the
> powerpc tree and commit 41de
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:15:34 -0800 (PST) David Miller
wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:36:46 +1100
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/iseries_veth.c between commit e92a665949f6
> > ("net: power
Hi Grant,
Today's linux-next merge of the irqdomain tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/irq.c between commit 8ee3e0d69623
("powerpc: Remove the main legacy iSerie platform code") from the tree
and three commits from the irqdomain tree.
I just removed the file.
--
Cheers,
Steph
26 matches
Mail list logo
