Re: Help needed with porting ether-net driver from ADS5121 to TWR-MPC5125

2011-12-19 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi, On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:38:58 +0800 G.H.Lee wrote: ... > I am a new user of the board TWR-MPC5125 made by freescale. Now I am trying > to porting the new kernel, i.e. the version 3.0.4, to this board. I have > porting the serial driver and the nand flash driver successfully. And I can > als

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

2011-12-19 Thread Li Yang
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 12/15/2011 08:44 PM, LiuShuo wrote: >> hi Artem, >> Could this patch be applied now and we make a independent patch for  bad >> block information >> migration later? > > This patch is not safe to use without migration. Hi Scott, We agree it

RE: RapidIO Direct I/O Support?

2011-12-19 Thread Bounine, Alexandre
On Monday, December 19, 2011 1:39 AM, Daniel Ng wrote: >Is there RapidIO Direct Memory I/O Support in the latest kernel? > >I've seen these patches from Freescale, but it seems they were never integrated- >http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2009/5/12/5686954 > >Does anyone know why the

Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] KVM: PPC: Keep page physical addresses in per-slot arrays

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 12.12.2011, at 23:28, Paul Mackerras wrote: > This allocates an array for each memory slot that is added to store > the physical addresses of the pages in the slot. This array is > vmalloc'd and accessed in kvmppc_h_enter using real_vmalloc_addr(). > This allows us to remove the ram_pginfo fi

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

2011-12-19 Thread Scott Wood
On 12/19/2011 05:05 AM, Li Yang wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Scott Wood wrote: >> On 12/15/2011 08:44 PM, LiuShuo wrote: >>> hi Artem, >>> Could this patch be applied now and we make a independent patch for bad >>> block information >>> migration later? >> >> This patch is not safe t

Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] KVM: Add barriers to allow mmu_notifier_retry to be used locklessly

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 12.12.2011, at 23:37, Paul Mackerras wrote: > This adds an smp_wmb in kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() and an > smp_rmb in mmu_notifier_retry() so that mmu_notifier_retry() will give > the correct answer when called without kvm->mmu_lock being held. > PowerPC Book3S HV KVM wants to use

Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] KVM: Add barriers to allow mmu_notifier_retry to be used locklessly

2011-12-19 Thread Avi Kivity
On 12/19/2011 07:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 12.12.2011, at 23:37, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > This adds an smp_wmb in kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() and an > > smp_rmb in mmu_notifier_retry() so that mmu_notifier_retry() will give > > the correct answer when called without kvm->mmu_

Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] KVM: PPC: Update Book3S HV memory handling

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 12.12.2011, at 23:23, Paul Mackerras wrote: > This series of patches updates the Book3S-HV KVM code that manages the > guest hashed page table (HPT) to enable several things: > > * MMIO emulation and MMIO pass-through > > * Use of small pages (4kB or 64kB, depending on config) to back the >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

2011-12-19 Thread Scott Wood
On 12/17/2011 08:35 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:30 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >> On 12/12/2011 03:19 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:15 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: NAND chips come from the factory with bad blocks marked at a certain offset in

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

2011-12-19 Thread Scott Wood
On 12/19/2011 12:38 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 12/17/2011 08:35 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> It looks like currently you can re-define chip->read_page, so I guess >> you should rework MTD and make chip->write_page re-definable? > > Unless something has changed very recently, there is no chip->re

linux-next: manual merge of the cputime tree with the powerpc tree

2011-12-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Martin, Today's linux-next merge of the cputime tree got a conflict in arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h between commit 9f5072d4f63f ("powerpc: Fix wrong divisor in usecs_to_cputime") from the powerpc tree and commit 648616343cdb ("[S390] cputime: add sparse checking and cleanup") from the cpu

RE: [PATCH 1/2] mtd/nand: fixup for fmr initialization of Freescale NAND controller

2011-12-19 Thread Liu Shengzhou-B36685
> -Original Message- > From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedeki...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:45 PM > To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685 > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; > dw...@infradead.org; Gala Kumar-B11780; linux-...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re:

[PATCH] powerpc/mpc85xx: 32bit address support for p1022ds

2011-12-19 Thread r66093
From: Jerry Huang All features for p1022ds are based on the 32bit address, 36bit only optional. We should make the PHYS_64BIT optional, remove the 'select PHYS_64BIT' from the Kconfig file in order to support 32bit address for P1022DS platform. Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang --- arch/powerpc/platf