From: Wolfgang Grandegger
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:43:05 +0100
> This patch series adds support for the MPC512x from Freescale to the
> mpc5xxx_can MSCAN driver. It has been tested on a MPC5121 and MPC5200B
> board.
So are these ready to go or should I wait for another round
of review? :-)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Grandegger
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:43:05 +0100
>
>> This patch series adds support for the MPC512x from Freescale to the
>> mpc5xxx_can MSCAN driver. It has been tested on a MPC5121 and MPC5200B
>> board.
>
> So are these ready to go or should I wait for
From: Wolfgang Grandegger
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:58:58 +0100
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Wolfgang Grandegger
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:43:05 +0100
>>
>>> This patch series adds support for the MPC512x from Freescale to the
>>> mpc5xxx_can MSCAN driver. It has been tested on a MPC5121 a
Scott Wood-2 wrote:
>
> Dario Presti wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm working on MPC8323_rdb board whit 1 new flash device S29GL512P
>> instead
>> of original flash devices.
>> the bootloader is u-boot 1.1.6 (I know is too old and I'm going to
>> upgrade
>> it) and the kernel is 2.6.20.
>
> 2.6.20 is al
Hi
I am using linux-2.6.26.8 kernel. In drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig,
MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM depends on MTD_NAND && OF_GPIO && (PPC_83xx || PPC_85xx).
But I didnt find any way to select OF_GPIO option in "make menuconfig". So I
removed it from Kconfig file and got MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM in menuconfig. I
selected i
The newly added fixup for buggy dcbX insn's has
a bug that always trigger a kernel TLB walk so a user space
dcbX insn will cause a Kernel Machine Check if it hits DTLB error.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
I found this problem in 2.4 and forward ported it to 2.6. I
cannot test it so I canno
Dario Presti wrote:
Thanks Scott,
I did not find where the custom map flash driver is in the kernel source,
where it is?
Grep your kernel tree for "MPC8323RDB Flash".
How can I say to the kernel to use device tree instead of custom map of
flash?
Turn off that mapping driver, and turn on CO
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:35 -0600, Hunter Cobbs wrote:
> I think that is definitely a solution. It does centralize the testing
> for this particular issue. The only thing question I have is if its
> really better to have the upper level do the check. Shouldn't the
> driver itself handle the hard
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 17:39, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:04, Finn Thain wrote:
>> BTW, there are a few other minor checkpatch issues with some of the
>> other patches in the series, too.
>
> I ran checkpatch on all those patches
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:35 -0600, Hunter Cobbs wrote:
I think that is definitely a solution. It does centralize the testing
for this particular issue. The only thing question I have is if its
really better to have the upper level do the check. Shouldn't the
driver its
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 13:28 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:35 -0600, Hunter Cobbs wrote:
> >> I think that is definitely a solution. It does centralize the testing
> >> for this particular issue. The only thing question I have is if its
> >> really
Most things mentioned are either obsolete (platform-support) or wrong (device
numbering, DCD spport) these days. The remaining rest is obvious.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Cc: Grant Likely
---
drivers/serial/mpc52xx_uart.c | 33 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:45:28AM -0800, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 13:28 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:35 -0600, Hunter Cobbs wrote:
> > >> I think that is definitely a solution. It does centralize the testing
> > >> for
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:46 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:45:28AM -0800, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 13:28 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:35 -0600, Hunter Cobbs wrote:
> > > >> I think that is d
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 17:39, Finn Thain
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:04, Finn Thain
> >> wrote: BTW, there are a few other minor
> >> checkpatch issues with some of the other patch
15 matches
Mail list logo
