Wolfram Sang schrieb:
Hello Rene,
I haven't actually applied the patch, just a few comments from a
glimpse:
Major nit: Please add to the comment that this bug is still present on
the MPC5200B, although it is not in its errata sheet. Thils will avoid
later confusion. (Out of interest, did you
If the initialization of a special QP (e.g. AQP1) fails due to a software
timeout,
we have to remove the reference to that special QP struct from the port struct
preventing the driver to access the QP, since it will be/has been destroyed
by the caller, ie in this case ib_mad.
This patch will apply
>From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity
for an interrupt that affinity
This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity
for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between
a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq.
On example of this is bringing up an ethernet interface, taking
it down and bringing it back up aga
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:09:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Ira Snyder wrote:
> > This adds support to Linux for a virtual ethernet interface which uses the
> > PCI bus as its transport mechanism. It creates a simple, familiar, and fast
> > method of communication
Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:57:09PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
Optionally you can further
reduce impact by checking if CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_BUGFIX is defined.
I would much prefer this.
I submitted a patch to enable pipelining on a MPC5200B recently. It was
disabled because
René Bürgel wrote:
But as the serial driver is also used for the MPC5121, we may have to
distinguish anyway. Does anyone have the possibility to test if the bug
in still present on MPC5121?
Tell us what to do to get it to occur and what we're looking for and we
have a bunch of boards at Gen
Hello Josh,
Have you had a chance to look at this patch.
> On Arches, SGMII0 Rx/Tx on CPU0 is wired to SGMII0 Tx/Rx on CPU1.
> Add GPCS as a phy type to allow for this.
Regards,
Victor Gallardo
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
h
Hello Rene,
I haven't actually applied the patch, just a few comments from a
glimpse:
> +/* macro with helper macros to safely reset rx which mustn't be done in
> break state.
> + * This is a workaround for processor bug #364 described in MPC5200 (L25R)
> Errata.
Minor nit: Kernel CodingStyle
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:02:53 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rakib Mullick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/
Hey, folks
This is v3 of my patch to work around erratum #364 of the MPC5200(B). I
removed most "magic" looking numbers, documenting the rest. As mentioned
before, the previous patches weren't working for low baudrates (<9600).
This should be fixed now.
But there's still one thing, that both
Grant Likely schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, René Bürgel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This patch is a workaround for bug #364 found in the MPC52xx processor.
The errata document can be found under
http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/MPC5200E.pdf?fpsp=1&WT_TYPE=Errata&W
Has anybody every used this chip in their design??
FYI, we have a custom board that I am bringing up right now that has a
MPC8572E that has its PCIE1 connected to the subject line PLX8616
PCI Express Switch...
As part of the boot, we successfully discover config the internal bridge
(i
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Ira Snyder wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:09:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > Why 'depends on !PCI'? This means that you cannot build a kernel that
> > is able to run both as host and endpoint for PCInet, right?
> >
>
> Yes, that is correct. I did this be
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> After I updated to 67d1128425 I get plenty of this:
>
> | VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly.
> | Freeing unused kernel memory: 148k init
> | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> /home/bigeasy/git/linux-2.6-powerpc
Hi René,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:40:09PM +0100, René Bürgel wrote:
> Hey, folks
>
> This is v3 of my patch to work around erratum #364 of the MPC5200(B). I
> removed most "magic" looking numbers, documenting the rest. As mentioned
> before, the previous patches weren't working for low baudr
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:23:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Ira Snyder wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:09:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Why 'depends on !PCI'? This means that you cannot build a kernel that
> > > is able to run both as host and
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 12:17 +0100, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> I must admit that I am not sure what you mean by (pci-endpoint)
> _name_.
> Do you mean something like this:
>
> PCI: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> endpoint = "pci-endpoint";
> ...
>
> To many "endpoint" a
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:03:57 -0500
Jon Tollefson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was suggested by Andrew that using a macro that made an array
> look like a function call made it harder to understand the code.
> Cleaned up use of macro. We now reference the pgtable_cache array
> directly instead
thanks, applied
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:07:46PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
>This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
>4xx PowerPC's.
>
>Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>---
>C
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:23:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Big snip.
> >
> > I tried to make the locking do only what was needed. I just couldn't get
> > it correct unless I used spin_lock_irqsave(). I was able to get the
> > system to deadlock otherwise. This is why I posted the driver for
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:56:56PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
> Please consider the following patches for the 2.6.27 stable tree.
>
> The first two allow a powerpc machine with more then 2 numa nodes
> to boot when 16G pages are enabled. The third one allows a powerpc
> machine to boot if using
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 07:16, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > It is device_type for PCIe right now, I'm afraid. This was what we agreed
> > upon. Here a code sniplet from the patch:
> >
> > /* Check if device_type property is set to "pci" or "pci-endpoint".
> > * Resulting from th
On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Ira Snyder wrote:
> This adds support to Linux for a virtual ethernet interface which uses the
> PCI bus as its transport mechanism. It creates a simple, familiar, and fast
> method of communication for two devices connected by a PCI interface.
Very interesting. I hav
This patch adds console polling support for the pmac_zilog serial driver.
>From e768d25cfa8e1f4a1eebb8fb69930c2ef64da2cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris J Arges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:10:37 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] pmac_zilog console polling support
Implemented poll_get
As far as I can tell, the PrPMC2800 is basically a lead-free PowerPMC280
with a bit more boot flash.
Has anyone booted current mainline kernels on a PowerPMC280? If so,
what config and bootloader options are required?
Thanks,
Chris
___
Linuxppc-
David Gibson writes:
> This patch adds a new backend for the hvc console based on the
> low-level udbg callbacks. This effectively implements a working
> runtime console in terms of the simple udbg primitives. This is kind
> of a hack - since udbg isn't something you really want to be using
> ro
28 matches
Mail list logo
