Hi all,
I am working on ep8548A embedded planet board.
I am using mpc8548cds dtb file (mpc8548cds.dts file in
arch/powerpc/boot/dts directory of the kernel source) as my device tree
file.
I am tracing the kernel initilization path through BDI.
The BDI tracing is hanging in early_init_devtree
Sebastien Dugue wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:18:27 +0200 Thomas Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NACK!
I regret but this patch is wrong. It is not sufficient to only lock
the replacement of an old list with a new list. Building up those
lists is a 3-step process:
1. Count the number of entri
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Documentation/powerpc/smp.txt is so outdated that it makes sense to just
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/powerpc/00-INDEX |2 --
Documentation/powerpc/smp.txt | 34 -
commit 14cf11af6cf608eb8c23e989ddb17a715ddce109 ("powerpc: Merge enough to
start building in arch/powerpc.") unwired /proc/ppc_htab, and commit
917f0af9e5a9ceecf9e72537fabb501254ba321d ("powerpc: Remove arch/ppc and
include/asm-ppc") removed the rest of the /proc/ppc_htab support, but there are
sti
Don't know if this helps but ..
The EP boards I've used have an old version of u-boot which don't support
passing the device tree address so I've had to build a cuImage.
Cheers.
poornima r wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on ep8548A embedded planet board.
I am using mpc8548cds dtb file (mpc8548cd
The following series implements basic board support for GE Fanuc's SBC610, a
6U single board computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
This series provides basic functionality:
- The board can boot with a serial console.
- Ethernet works, though the phys are polled.
- The PCI bus is scanned and sa
Support for the SBC610 VPX Single Board Computer from GE Fanuc (PowerPC
MPC8641D).
This is the default config file for GE Fanuc's SBC610, a 6U single board
computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/configs/86xx/gef_sbc610_defconfig
Support for the SBC610 VPX Single Board Computer from GE Fanuc (PowerPC
MPC8641D).
This is the basic board support for GE Fanuc's SBC610, a 6U single board
computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/gef_sbc610.dts | 26
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:13:13 +0200 Thomas Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:18:27 +0200 Thomas Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> NACK!
> >>
> >> I regret but this patch is wrong. It is not sufficient to only lock
> >> the replacement of a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 03:13:32PM +0200, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
[...]
> > we are a bit worried about putting this into the mainstream part of non real
> > time linux.
>
> Heck, I sure do not want this to be applied mainstream nor into any tree.
> The sole purpose of this patch was to trigger so
Hi Jon,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:06:23PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I have demultiplexing the GPIO interrupts working well enough to make
> my hardware work. But now I've discovered that these interrupts can't
> do what I need.
>
> Anton, Grant - are either of you interested in this code? It's n
Hi Anton,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:59:47 +0400 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 03:13:32PM +0200, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> [...]
> > > we are a bit worried about putting this into the mainstream part of non
> > > real
> > > time linux.
> >
> > Heck, I sure
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:06:23PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> I have demultiplexing the GPIO interrupts working well enough to make
>> my hardware work. But now I've discovered that these interrupts can't
>> d
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:37:55AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Anton Vorontsov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:06:23PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> I have demultiplexing the GPIO interrupts working well enough to make
> >> m
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:37:55AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Anton Vorontsov
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi Jon,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:06:23PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:36:22AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
[...]
> >> >> -/*
> >> >> - * Not implemented, yet.
> >> >> - */
> >> >> -static inline int gpio_to_irq(unsigned int gpio)
> >> >> +static inline unsigned int gpio_to_irq(unsigned int gpio)
> >> >> {
> >> >> - return -ENOSYS;
> >> >>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:36:22AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> [...]
>> >> >> -/*
>> >> >> - * Not implemented, yet.
>> >> >> - */
>> >> >> -static inline int gpio_to_irq(unsigned int gpio)
>> >> >> +static inline unsigned
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:36:22AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> [...]
>> >> >> -/*
>> >> >> - * Not implemented, yet.
>> >> >> - */
>> >> >> -static inline int gpio_to_irq(unsigned int gpio)
>> >> >> +static inline unsigned
On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Please pull from 'for-2.6.27' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
for-2.6.27
to receive the following updates:
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8610_hpcd.dts |8 +--
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c | 7
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:54:59 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
>
> > The following series implements basic board support for GE Fanuc's
> > SBC610, a
> > 6U single board computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
> >
> > This series
On Sep 3, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
This is just a parallel of a5dc66e2ab2e2cf641346b056a69a67cfcf9458c
applied to the sbc8560 board.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sbc8560.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletion
Introduced a new set of low level tlb invalidate functions that do not
broadcast invalidates on the bus:
_tlbil_all - invalidate all
_tlbil_pid - invalidate based on process id (or mm context)
_tlbil_va - invalidate based on virtual address (ea + pid)
On non-SMP configs _tlbil_all should be func
We need to create a false data dependency to ensure the loads of
the pte are done in the right order.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S | 26 +-
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powe
There are some minor issues with support 64-bit PTEs on a 32-bit processor
when dealing with SMP.
* We need to order the stores in set_pte_at to make sure the flag word
is set second.
* Change pte_clear to use pte_update so only the flag word is cleared
* Added a WARN_ON to set_pte_at to ensure
Implement _PAGE_SPECIAL and pte_special() for 32-bit powerpc. This bit will
be used by the fast get_user_pages() to differenciate PTEs that correspond
to a valid struct page from special mappings that don't such as IO mappings
obtained via io_remap_pfn_ranges().
We currently only implement this on
On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
Support for the SBC610 VPX Single Board Computer from GE Fanuc
(PowerPC
MPC8641D).
This is the basic board support for GE Fanuc's SBC610, a 6U single
board
computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
Support for the SBC610 VPX Single Board Computer from GE Fanuc
(PowerPC
MPC8641D).
This is the default config file for GE Fanuc's SBC610, a 6U single
board
computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
The following series implements basic board support for GE Fanuc's
SBC610, a
6U single board computer, based on Freescale's MPC8641D.
This series provides basic functionality:
- The board can boot with a serial console.
- Ethernet works, thoug
thanks, queued for 2.6.28.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anton Vorontsov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Assume that GPIO 8 does not translate to any IRQ, but IRQ 8 is still
> > valid virq b/c it is mapped for another IRQ controller (particularly
> > lots of k
Kumar Gala writes:
> > Jochen Friedrich (1):
> > powerpc/cpm1: Fix race condition in CPM1 GPIO library.
This looks like a biggish change for after -rc6, and the commit
message doesn't tell me what dire things will happen if the patch
doesn't go in, or what systems see this breakage, or wheth
> static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end)
> {
> - _tlbia();
> + _tlbil_all();
> }
I love making you respin your patches so what about the one above
becomes tlbil_pid(0) ? :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
___
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anton Vorontsov
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Assume that GPIO 8 does not translate to any IRQ, but IRQ 8 is still
>> > valid
Implement _PAGE_SPECIAL and pte_special() for 32-bit powerpc. This bit will
be used by the fast get_user_pages() to differenciate PTEs that correspond
to a valid struct page from special mappings that don't such as IO mappings
obtained via io_remap_pfn_ranges().
We currently only implement this on
There are some minor issues with support 64-bit PTEs on a 32-bit processor
when dealing with SMP.
* We need to order the stores in set_pte_at to make sure the flag word
is set second.
* Change pte_clear to use pte_update so only the flag word is cleared
* Added a WARN_ON to set_pte_at to ensure
Introduced a new set of low level tlb invalidate functions that do not
broadcast invalidates on the bus:
_tlbil_all - invalidate all
_tlbil_pid - invalidate based on process id (or mm context)
_tlbil_va - invalidate based on virtual address (ea + pid)
On non-SMP configs _tlbil_all should be func
We need to create a false data dependency to ensure the loads of
the pte are done in the right order.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S | 26 +-
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powe
On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
- _tlbia();
+ _tlbil_all();
}
I love making you respin your patches so what about the one abov
On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Kumar Gala writes:
Jochen Friedrich (1):
powerpc/cpm1: Fix race condition in CPM1 GPIO library.
This looks like a biggish change for after -rc6, and the commit
message doesn't tell me what dire things will happen if the patch
doesn't g
We have all sort of totally rotten pieces of documentation
in there, let's get rid of them
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
ppc_htab.txt | 118 --
smp.txt | 34 ---
sound.txt |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:32:45PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anton Vorontsov
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Assume tha
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Anton Vorontsov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:32:45PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 16, 20
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> You have to map between GPIO and IRQ inside the interrupt handlers so
> it has to be reasonably fast. This gets done on every shared interrupt
> so you will end up building mapping tables. Also, gpio_to_irq()
> doesn't take the gpio chip
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> You have to map between GPIO and IRQ inside the interrupt handlers so
>> it has to be reasonably fast. This gets done on every shared interrupt
>> so you will end u
Leave the safe in the closet and don't lock it. They will build it
into the closet permanently.
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
45 matches
Mail list logo
