Paul,
please do
git-pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vitb/linux-2.6-8xx.git
for-paulus
to receive the following updates:
Jochen Friedrich (4):
powerpc: fix typo #ifdef -> #ifndef
powerpc: kill non-existent symbols from ksyms and commproc.h
powerpc: Add suppo
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:00:25 +0300
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> Paul,
>
> please do
> git-pull
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vitb/linux-2.6-8xx.git
> for-paulus
>
> to receive the following updates:
>
Forgot to tell that this is .25 material...
--
Sincerely, Vitaly
__
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 11:36 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:20PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > From: Stuart Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch allows you to build the DTC source without making the
> > tests directory. This is necessary when cross compiling as
On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:00:25 +0300
> Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> please do
>> git-pull
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vitb/linux-2.6-8xx.git
>> for-paulus
>>
>> to receive the following updates:
>>
> Forgot to tell that
OK git gurus, this is something I have not figured out: the best way to
add acked-by (or additional signed-off-by) lines to git patches.
What I'm talking about is when I've applied a patch to my repo and
published the change on the list and get an "acked-by" back. By the
time I get the ack, th
On 12/08/2007 09:21 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> OK git gurus, this is something I have not figured out: the best way to
> add acked-by (or additional signed-off-by) lines to git patches.
>
> What I'm talking about is when I've applied a patch to my repo and
> published the change on the list an
On 12/8/07, Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stacked git should work (effectively does the same thing but more
> gracefully), but I have not gone that route yet.
This is my preferred solution, but you don't have to do it this way.
>
> There must be a better way, if only I could find t
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:21:05 -0500 Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK git gurus, this is something I have not figured out: the best way to
> add acked-by (or additional signed-off-by) lines to git patches.
Have a look at "git rebase -i"
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 21:05 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:00:15 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > Index: linux-work/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ep405.dts
> >
> > +config TAISHAN
> > + bool "Taishan"
> > + depends on 44x
> > + default n
> > + select 440GX
> > + help
> > + This option enables support for the IBM PPC440GX "Taishan" evaluation
> > board.
>
> AMCC Taishan board.
Ah yeah, indeed. I'll fix these. (BTW. Could you CC Hugh next
> > + /* Walnut has all 4 IRQ pins tied together per slot */
>
> Not a Walnut board.
Right, though the IRQ routing is similar (the comment is correct)
> > + interrupt-map-mask = ;
> > + interrupt-map = <
> > + /* ID
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 21:22 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:00:20 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This adds a function to the bootwrapper 4xx library to decode memory
> > size on 440SPE processors.
>
> Why did you rename the fixup_memsize functio
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 08:02 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> > Ah... crap ! Do you think we should put that in the boot wrapper and
> > fixup the device-tree or should we put it in the PCIe code proper ?
>
> How about this: We change the compatible node to "plb-pciex-440spe"
> (without "A" and "B
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:09 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > From: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
> > These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
> > The PHY code is based on
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 21:27 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:00:22 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Index: linux-work/arch/powerpc/boot/reg.h
> > ===
> > --- linux-work.orig/arch/powerp
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:00 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> But that is how we already handle this today, in numerous places in
> the
> kernel for this very type.
>
> So, you can disagree that this is what we need to do, and if so, feel
> free to fix up a whole lot of files in the tree :)
Heh, ok, allri
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 02:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
Ah excellent, I had that on my to-do list for some time. However, we
should also rename it as I'm getting more and more pressure to put a
real void * arch_data in here for use by
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 09:44 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 02:07:26 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:00:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I started out looking for ways to remove our dependencies on
18 matches
Mail list logo
