Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 13:58 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Every once in a while the touchpad in my iBook G4 (geyser1, 030B) is
>> going wild, emitting random movement events even when not being touched.
>> That started only with 2.6.24-rc1. The only w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This patch adds support for 'mpc5200-simple-platform' compatible
> boards which do not need a platform specific setup. Such boards
> are supported assuming the following:
...
> + const char *board[] = {
> + "tqc,tqm5200",
> +
Hi Steve,
On Friday 09 November 2007, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I am using the Denx 2.6.32 kernel, which does have powerpc/sequoia.
> Xenomai is a real-time kernel built on Adeos/Ipipe. I'll dig into it
> further.
Is this arch/ppc or arch/powerpc? I remember fixing this a while ago in
arch/ppc:
Hi,
The 2.6.24-rc2-git1 kernel build fails with randconfig on powerpc,
CC arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_64.o
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_64.c: In function ‘pgtable_free_now’:
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_64.c:71: error: ‘pte_free_smp_sync’ undeclared (first use
in this function)
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_64.c:71: error:
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:50:29 +1100
> Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Gerhard Pircher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: Kernel locks up after calling kernel_execve()
>
> > I tried to use /bin/sh as ini
I'm doing final clean up the i2c open firmware support. What is the
intention of this code? Is it meant for a missing IRQ attribute to
return a zero and not get an IRQ for the device? Does the device
function without an IRQ? If so, it needs a comment explaining things.
Otherwise IRQ of zero should
[POWERPC] Fix CONFIG_SMP=n build error
The patch "KVM: fix !SMP build error" change the way smp_call_function()
actually uses the passed in function names on non-SMP builds. So
previously it was never caught that the function passed in was never
actually defined.
This causes a build error on ppc6
On Nov 10, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I'm doing final clean up the i2c open firmware support. What is the
> intention of this code? Is it meant for a missing IRQ attribute to
> return a zero and not get an IRQ for the device? Does the device
> function without an IRQ? If so, it needs a
On 11/10/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the current driver it looks like we could get ride of if
> check since the previous code checked the return of platform_get_irq().
The code was a snippet from the larger patch that is converting i2c
from being a platform driver to a o
On Nov 10, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 11/10/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looking at the current driver it looks like we could get ride of if
>> check since the previous code checked the return of
>> platform_get_irq().
>
> The code was a snippet from the larger patc
On 11/10/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > On 11/10/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Looking at the current driver it looks like we could get ride of if
> >> check since the previous code checked the return of
> >> platfo
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:11 +0100, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:50:29 +1100
> > Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: Gerhard Pircher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > Betreff: Re: Kernel locks
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:59:29PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> [POWERPC] Fix CONFIG_SMP=n build error
>
> The patch "KVM: fix !SMP build error" change the way smp_call_function()
> actually uses the passed in function names on non-SMP builds. So
> previously it was never caught that the functio
> Seems like a "better" (but still ugly) workaround would be to create a
> _new_ reservation to a RA that's unavailable to any userspace process,
> so that they could never do a successful store to it. That way you would
> have stray reservations, but never dangling stwcx:es. No?
Many processors
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 17:18 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > On 11/10/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Looking at the current driver it looks like we could get ride of if
> >> check since the previous code checked the return of
> >> pl
> irq_of_parse_and_map() returns NO_IRQ when the irq parameter is missing.
>
> This API appears to be broken. In asm-powerpc/irq.h NO_IRQ is defined
> as (0). There is no way to tell an error in the attribute from a valid
> attribute selecting interrupt zero.
No, it is not broken. Interrupt numb
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 03:46:05PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Seems like a "better" (but still ugly) workaround would be to create a
> > _new_ reservation to a RA that's unavailable to any userspace process,
> > so that they could never do a successful store to it. That way you wou
17 matches
Mail list logo
