Douglas Miller writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Yes, your patch seems a more complete solution. The idea of "d1", "d2",
> "d4", and "d8" commands is more what I needed and makes more sense to
> someone hitting xmon "cold". I'll work on getting your patch submitted.
>
>
> Question on these sorts of pat
On 02/06/2017 07:50 AM, Douglas Miller wrote:
Hi Michael,
Yes, your patch seems a more complete solution. The idea of "d1",
"d2", "d4", and "d8" commands is more what I needed and makes more
sense to someone hitting xmon "cold". I'll work on getting your patch
submitted.
Question on these
Hi Michael,
Yes, your patch seems a more complete solution. The idea of "d1", "d2",
"d4", and "d8" commands is more what I needed and makes more sense to
someone hitting xmon "cold". I'll work on getting your patch submitted.
Question on these sorts of patches (PPC only), do we submit initia
Douglas Miller writes:
> I'm referring to the three commands listed in the help:
>
> d dump bytes
>
> dfdump float values
>
> dddump double values
>
> As it turns out, all three of these commands do exactly the same thing,
> and it's certainly not what I'd expect based on experience
I'm referring to the three commands listed in the help:
d dump bytes
dfdump float values
dddump double values
As it turns out, all three of these commands do exactly the same thing,
and it's certainly not what I'd expect based on experience with other
debuggers. Maybe the origina
Douglas Miller writes:
> I was hoping this would be any easy fix, but now it looks like it will
> be more difficult.
>
> The basic problem is that xmon memory commands like 'dd' do not properly
> display the data on LE instances. This means that not only is it
> difficult to read but one canno
I was hoping this would be any easy fix, but now it looks like it will
be more difficult.
The basic problem is that xmon memory commands like 'dd' do not properly
display the data on LE instances. This means that not only is it
difficult to read but one cannot copy-paste addresses from the ou
