Re: relocatable kernel vs. yaboot

2008-10-30 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 08:33 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Yes, yaboot needs to be fixed. Yeah, my bad, I was offline when writing this and only checked later to find you'd already discussed that. Sorry. > > Modifying the vmlinux in the same way as above makes yaboot take it, and > > I can easil

Re: relocatable kernel vs. yaboot

2008-10-30 Thread Paul Mackerras
Johannes Berg writes: > Sorry if this has been discussed before, but I just found that yaboot > rejects relocatable kernels claiming they are an invalid ELF file. Yes, yaboot needs to be fixed. > In the patch adding relocatable kernel support, I found > > +# The iseries hypervisor won't take an

relocatable kernel vs. yaboot

2008-10-30 Thread Johannes Berg
Hi, Sorry if this has been discussed before, but I just found that yaboot rejects relocatable kernels claiming they are an invalid ELF file. In the patch adding relocatable kernel support, I found +# The iseries hypervisor won't take an ET_DYN executable, so this +# changes the type (byte 17) in