On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 13:23 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Before 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses"), in
> save_mce_event, index got the value of mce_nest_count, and
> mce_nest_count was incremented *after* index was set.
>
> However, that patch changed the behaviour so that mce_n
Before 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses"), in
save_mce_event, index got the value of mce_nest_count, and
mce_nest_count was incremented *after* index was set.
However, that patch changed the behaviour so that mce_nest count was
incremented *before* setting index.
This causes an
Stable folks please ignore this patch.
Comments below.
On Mon, 2015-11-05 at 00:48:32 UTC, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Before 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses"), in
> save_mce_event, index got the value of mce_nest_count, and
> mce_nest_count was incremented *after* index was set.
>
On 2015-05-11 10:48:32 Mon, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Before 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses"), in
> save_mce_event, index got the value of mce_nest_count, and
> mce_nest_count was incremented *after* index was set.
>
> However, that patch changed the behaviour so that mce_nest cou
Before 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses"), in
save_mce_event, index got the value of mce_nest_count, and
mce_nest_count was incremented *after* index was set.
However, that patch changed the behaviour so that mce_nest count was
incremented *before* setting index.
This causes an
