On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 12:28:52 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I got the logic wrong in the DT CPU features code when I added the
> Power9 DD2.1 feature. We should be setting the bit if we detect a
> DD2.1, not clearing it if we detect a DD2.0.
>
> This code isn't actually exercised at the moment s
I got the logic wrong in the DT CPU features code when I added the
Power9 DD2.1 feature. We should be setting the bit if we detect a
DD2.1, not clearing it if we detect a DD2.0.
This code isn't actually exercised at the moment so nothing is
actually broken.
Fixes: 3ffa9d9e2a7c ("powerpc/64s: Fix
