On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 11:15:29 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> It seems we didn't pay quite enough attention when testing the new cache
> shape vectors, which means we didn't notice the bug where the vector for
> the L1D was using the L1I values. Fix it, resulting in eg:
>
> L1I cache size:
It seems we didn't pay quite enough attention when testing the new cache
shape vectors, which means we didn't notice the bug where the vector for
the L1D was using the L1I values. Fix it, resulting in eg:
L1I cache size: 0x8000 32768B 32K
L1I line size:0x80 8-w
