Roland McGrath wrote:
Ok. That looks like a bug in the older binutils (objcopy) you are using.
It is confused by the empty .rela.dyn section right next to the .dynamic
section. Current binutils don't seem to have a problem with this.
I haven't tried to get an old binutils running to reproduce
Ok. That looks like a bug in the older binutils (objcopy) you are using.
It is confused by the empty .rela.dyn section right next to the .dynamic
section. Current binutils don't seem to have a problem with this.
I haven't tried to get an old binutils running to reproduce this.
I suspect the foll
Roland McGrath wrote:
I haven't seen that error before. Can you show the output of {eu-,}readelf -lS
on vdso64.so.dbg, and also on the vdso64.so successfully built when you
revert the patch?
I've attached the raw output from the two commands. The delta between
the two is as follows:
-Ther
I haven't seen that error before. Can you show the output of {eu-,}readelf -lS
on vdso64.so.dbg, and also on the vdso64.so successfully built when you
revert the patch?
Thanks,
Roland
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs
I'm using gcc 3.4.3 and binutils 2.15.92.0.2. I originally saw the
following problem in 2.6.25 but it's present in git head as well:
CALL /home/cfriesen/kernels/2.6.25/linux-2.6.25/scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CALL
/home/cfriesen/kernels/2.6.25/linux-2.6.25/ar
