On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 01:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> My plan on the sparc side is to remove the SBUS device type and bus
> entirely, as well as the EBUS layer I have. All of it can use
> of_device nodes on of_platform_bus. Even the DMA stuff just falls out
> of everything transparently be
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 18:26:11 +1000
> Well, we aren't totally clear as to whether we'll use of_device much or
> not in the long term. For bus types that already have their own
> descendant of struct device (such as PCI, but also i2c, USB, etc...)
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 00:59 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Since it came to my attention due to the build error fix
> I just had to fix, I figured I'd mention some things.
>
> Right now, powerpc and sparc differ in how they resolve
> interrupts and resources.
>
> Powerpc uses an on-demand model, w
Since it came to my attention due to the build error fix
I just had to fix, I figured I'd mention some things.
Right now, powerpc and sparc differ in how they resolve
interrupts and resources.
Powerpc uses an on-demand model, whereas Sparc pre-resolves
everything at bootup when parsing the OF tr
