On Sunday 10 February 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 2/9/08, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 10 February 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > of_iomap doesn't implicitly do a request_mem_region(). How should
> > > request_mem_region() be handled? When using of_iomap you don't get the
>
On 2/9/08, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > of_iomap doesn't implicitly do a request_mem_region(). How should
> > request_mem_region() be handled? When using of_iomap you don't get the
> > length of the region back so it isn't easy to call
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
> of_iomap doesn't implicitly do a request_mem_region(). How should
> request_mem_region() be handled? When using of_iomap you don't get the
> length of the region back so it isn't easy to call request_mem_region.
>
> What about adding a third param to
of_iomap doesn't implicitly do a request_mem_region(). How should
request_mem_region() be handled? When using of_iomap you don't get the
length of the region back so it isn't easy to call request_mem_region.
What about adding a third param to of_iomap for the driver name? If it
is non-null also d
