I thought it had been...? Need to investigate (as baby permits...)
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin"
>wrote:
>> >
>> > On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > >
Hi again,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> >
> > On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include
> >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. Thes
On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include
>> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
>> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones am
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include
> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
>
hpa,
Was this change only needed
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
produced these warnings:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-offsets.h:1:0,
from kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:9:
include/generated/asm-offsets.h:15:0: warning: "NMI_MASK" redefin
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
> > files.
> >
> > please check
> >
> > [PATCH -v3] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
> >
> > Use __init_
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
> files.
>
> please check
>
> [PATCH -v3] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
>
> Use __init_memblock to replace __init, and remove __init in memb
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:33:34 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> On 09/14/2010 05:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Do not remove the "extern" key word.
>
> why? you got another warning?
It is normal C coding practice to mark declarations in header files with
extern. It probably does
On 09/14/2010 05:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
>> files.
>
> Do not remove the "extern" key word.
>
why? you got another warning?
Yinghai
_
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
> files.
Do not remove the "extern" key word.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
On 09/13/2010 09:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:24:20 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
>>> powerpc allnoconfig build:
>>>
>>> WARNING:
Hi Yinghai,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:24:20 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
> > powerpc allnoconfig build:
> >
> > WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25d80): Section mismatch in refe
On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
> powerpc allnoconfig build:
>
> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25d80): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function memblock_double_array() to the function .init.text:me
On 09/12/2010 08:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
>
> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Se
Hi Yinghai,
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:14:15 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> please check it, and it should get into core/memblock branch.
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
>
> [PATCH] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
>
> for arches that use memblock other than x86
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
> Si
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Section mismatch in reference from the
function memblock_find_i
17 matches
Mail list logo
