On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:48:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:57:19 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > driver-core/driver-core-remove-no-longer-used-struct-class_d
Hi Greg,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:57:19 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > driver-core/driver-core-remove-no-longer-used-struct-class_device.patch
> > should be merged late
I still need to revert this so that t
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:21:21 -0700
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:39:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created today's linux-next tree at
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
> > (tar balls at
> > http:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:57:19 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > I have started this tree by reverting the following:
> > driver-core/driver-core-remove-no-longer-used-struct-class_device.patch
> > should be mer
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
> (tar balls at
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
>
> You can see which tree
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:39:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
> (tar balls at
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
gcc doesn't like nested /* comme
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
(tar balls at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source. There are a