On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:03:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:53:37 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, it's sched/numa since that's what introduced numa_init(). It does
> > for_each_node() for each node and does a kmalloc_node() even though that
> > nod
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
>
> > Sorry, got it... CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled below...
> >
> > pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
> > Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 5, 2097152 bytes)
> > Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 4, 10
Hi David,
On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:53:37 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes
wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's sched/numa since that's what introduced numa_init(). It does
> for_each_node() for each node and does a kmalloc_node() even though that
> node may not be online. Slub ends up passing this node to the page
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Sorry, got it... CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled below...
>
> pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 5, 2097152 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 4, 1048576 bytes)
> Mount-cache hash table
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
>
> > > > > Trying David's patch just posted doesn't fix it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, what does CONFIG_DEBUG_VM say?
> > >
> > > No set.
> >
> > Sorry, should have read "Not set"
> >
>
> I mean if it's set, what does
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > > Trying David's patch just posted doesn't fix it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, what does CONFIG_DEBUG_VM say?
> >
> > No set.
>
> Sorry, should have read "Not set"
>
I mean if it's set, what does it emit to the kernel log with my patch
applied?
Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > Trying David's patch just posted doesn't fix it.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, what does CONFIG_DEBUG_VM say?
>
> No set.
Sorry, should have read "Not set"
mikey
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://
> > Trying David's patch just posted doesn't fix it.
> >
>
> Hmm, what does CONFIG_DEBUG_VM say?
No set.
Mikey
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
> console [tty0] enabled
> console [hvc0] enabled
> pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 5, 2097152 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 4, 1048576 bytes)
> Mount-cache hash table entri
> Hi all,
>
> Last nights boot tests on various PowerPC systems failed like this:
>
> calling .numa_group_init+0x0/0x3c @ 1
> initcall .numa_group_init+0x0/0x3c returned 0 after 0 usecs
> calling .numa_init+0x0/0x1dc @ 1
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x1688
>
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x1688
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc016e154
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> SMP NR_CPUS=32 NUMA pSeries
> Modules linked in:
> NIP: c016e154 LR: c00
Hi all,
Last nights boot tests on various PowerPC systems failed like this:
calling .numa_group_init+0x0/0x3c @ 1
initcall .numa_group_init+0x0/0x3c returned 0 after 0 usecs
calling .numa_init+0x0/0x1dc @ 1
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x1688
Faulting instructi
12 matches
Mail list logo
