On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Robert Berger
wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 09:28 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:01:55PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I've asked Tony to have a look at splitting the build decision
>>> in arch/powerpc/boot along the same lines as th
On 04/02/2012 09:28 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:01:55PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> Ok, I've asked Tony to have a look at splitting the build decision
>> in arch/powerpc/boot along the same lines as the CPU families... ie only
>> wrappers for platforms potenti
Dear Stephen Rothwell,
In message <20120405100228.9ca940aa4739e81540bb2...@canb.auug.org.au> you wrote:
>
> > ELDK 4.2 is based on gcc version 4.2.2 / binutils version 2.17.50.0.12
> > 20070128. This is obviously to old for this code. I do not see an
> > actual problem with that - nobody can exp
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:21:01 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> The kernel README says nothing about binutils requirements, the only
> tool related statement is "Make sure you have at least gcc 3.2
> available." Actually I doubt if gcc 3.2 wouldbuild a working kernel
> image.
>
> ELDK 4.2 is based o
Dear Josh,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > The kernel shouldn't have tried to build that instruction on 8xx, though
> > I suppose if it's in arch/powerpc/boot, we are a bit too eager at
> > building everything including what's not relevant, we might to be a bit
> > more careful at excluding 4xx stuf
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:10 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 00:53 +0200, Frank Svendsbøe wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Josh Boyer,
>> >>
>> >> just wante
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:10 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 00:53 +0200, Frank Svendsbøe wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Josh Boyer,
> >>
> >> just wanted to add that I'm experiencing the same problem that Robert
> >> reporte
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 00:53 +0200, Frank Svendsbøe wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh Boyer,
>>
>> just wanted to add that I'm experiencing the same problem that Robert
>> reported, but on 8xx instead of 4xx. The mpc8xx does not support the
>> mfdc
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:28:29PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:01:55PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've asked Tony to have a look at splitting the build decision
> > in arch/powerpc/boot along the same lines as the CPU families... ie only
> > wrappers
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:01:55PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Ok, I've asked Tony to have a look at splitting the build decision
> in arch/powerpc/boot along the same lines as the CPU families... ie only
> wrappers for platforms potentially supported by the built kernel. That
> should
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 00:14 +0200, Frank E. Svendsbøe wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:03:04AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 00:53 +0200, Frank Svendsbøe wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Josh Boyer,
> > >
> > > just wanted to add that I'm experiencing the same problem that
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:03:04AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 00:53 +0200, Frank Svendsbøe wrote:
>
> > Hi Josh Boyer,
> >
> > just wanted to add that I'm experiencing the same problem that Robert
> > reported, but on 8xx instead of 4xx. The mpc8xx does not suppo
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 00:53 +0200, Frank Svendsbøe wrote:
> Hi Josh Boyer,
>
> just wanted to add that I'm experiencing the same problem that Robert
> reported, but on 8xx instead of 4xx. The mpc8xx does not support the
> mfdcrx instruction, so maybe it's more to it than just a binutils bug?
The
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 17:25 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> > > The problem is that for ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (which comes
>>> with the
>>> > > ELDK 4.2) this assembly inst
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 17:25 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > > The problem is that for ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (which comes
>> with the
>> > > ELDK 4.2) this assembly instruction is not known and the build
>> breaks.
>> >
>> > Sigh
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 17:25 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > The problem is that for ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (which comes
> with the
> > > ELDK 4.2) this assembly instruction is not known and the build
> breaks.
> >
> > Sigh. GCC 4.2 is pretty old at this point.
>
> But still rock-solid ...
Dear Tony,
In message <20120321221402.ga18...@thor.bakeyournoodle.com> you wrote:
>
> > What puzzles me is that also stuff for boards is being compiled which is
> > not really needed like treeboot-currituck.c even when I configure the
> > kernel for a kilauea board.
>
> Can you either propvide t
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:10:59PM +0200, Robert Berger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Up to 3.2.x I was able to compile a mainline kernel for the kilauea
> board, but...
>
> http://git.denx.de/?p=linux-denx.git;a=commitdiff;h=075bcf5879225d0c2a119c23d8046b890e051e81
>
> shows, that mfdcrx was introduced in t
Dear Josh,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > The problem is that for ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (which comes with the
> > ELDK 4.2) this assembly instruction is not known and the build breaks.
>
> Sigh. GCC 4.2 is pretty old at this point.
But still rock-solid ... We use it a lot, especially as ref
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Robert Berger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Up to 3.2.x I was able to compile a mainline kernel for the kilauea
> board, but...
>
> http://git.denx.de/?p=linux-denx.git;a=commitdiff;h=075bcf5879225d0c2a119c23d8046b890e051e81
>
> shows, that mfdcrx was introduced in the v3.3 ker
Hi,
Up to 3.2.x I was able to compile a mainline kernel for the kilauea
board, but...
http://git.denx.de/?p=linux-denx.git;a=commitdiff;h=075bcf5879225d0c2a119c23d8046b890e051e81
shows, that mfdcrx was introduced in the v3.3 kernel.
The problem is that for ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (which comes
21 matches
Mail list logo
