On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:42:39 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:51:21 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anyone know why dt_vdevices() creates a vscsi node on legacy iseries?
> > >
On Thu, Aug 23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:51:21 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why dt_vdevices() creates a vscsi node on legacy iseries?
> > I'm sure only viodasd and viocd is required as blockdevice type.
>
> Because the IBM vscs
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:51:21 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know why dt_vdevices() creates a vscsi node on legacy iseries?
> I'm sure only viodasd and viocd is required as blockdevice type.
Because the IBM vscsi client (in theory) works on legacy iSeries.
--
Chee
Does anyone know why dt_vdevices() creates a vscsi node on legacy iseries?
I'm sure only viodasd and viocd is required as blockdevice type.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev