RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-07 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
n Loeliger > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Michal Simek; git > > > Subject: Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for > > > microblaze and PowerPC > > > > > > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > > >

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-02 Thread Grant Likely
t; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Michal Simek; git > > Subject: Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for > > microblaze and PowerPC > > > > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for al

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-02 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:44:02PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: [snip] > > > reg = < 81c0 40 >; > > > > If these registers are addressable, then the parent needs a > > 'ranges' property. > > I thought ranges weren't necessary in a 1:1 mapping? You were

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-02 Thread David Gibson
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > So: the mpmc generates a 'memory' node, corresponding to it's memory > > interface. It also gets a separate entry which contains the (optional, not > > present i

RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-26 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
Stephen Neuendorffer; Segher Boessenkool; David Gibson; > Jon Loeliger > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Michal Simek; git > Subject: Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for > microblaze and PowerPC > > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > <[E

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-25 Thread Grant Likely
to the xps-ll-temac node... In fact, if the network nodes are children of the xps-ll-temac node, then the xps-ll-temac node should itself be a child of the addressable bus (be it PLB or OPB). Cheers, g. > > 3) All of this is very different in structure from the way that the > xparamete

RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-24 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
ply other parameters of the ll_temac driver. Although the above structure better represents the actual system, there is another organization for people to be confused about. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stephen Neuendorffer Sent: Tue 11/20/2007 1

Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-20 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
I've updated some code from Michel Simek to generate Flat Device Trees from Xilinx EDK projects. This code is now hosted at: git://git.xilinx.com/gen-mhs-devtree.git This has one major advantage over the gen-mhs-devtree.py approach: default IP core parameters that are not specified in th