> Is there any update on this in the meantime? Do you know of any plans to re-
> work/-push this patchset? Just checking...
I had another look recently; I wouldn't like to just copy/paste the
"new_id"-mechanism from PCI because the code would then exist three
times in the kernel (PCMCIA being the
Wolfram,
On Thursday 28 January 2010 11:45:45 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I guess I'd like to just open up a discussion, see if there's been any
> > progress towards a general solution.
>
> I decided to wait for the outcome of the of_platform-removal-idea. Though,
> I have to admit that in the last w
John,
> I came across this thread/patchset from around June last year:
>
> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073086.html
>
> where Wolfgang proposed a generic OF-driven UIO driver. The
Wolfram, please ;)
> discussion seemed to stall after Grant Likely indicated he didn'
Hi,
I came across this thread/patchset from around June last year:
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073086.html
where Wolfgang proposed a generic OF-driven UIO driver. The
discussion seemed to stall after Grant Likely indicated he didn't like
the use of a linux-specific
