Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> We probably can. After introducing a kernel_compat_siginfo that is
>> the size that userspace actually would need.
>>
>> It isn't something I want to mess with until this code gets merged, as I
>>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> We probably can. After introducing a kernel_compat_siginfo that is
> the size that userspace actually would need.
>
> It isn't something I want to mess with until this code gets merged, as I
> think the set_fs cleanups are more
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:34:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Looks good. Want me to put it into vfs.git? #work.set_fs-exec, perhaps?
>
> Sounds good.
Applied, pushed and added into #for-next
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:34:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Looks good. Want me to put it into vfs.git? #work.set_fs-exec, perhaps?
Sounds good.
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and
> coredump code. Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are
> those to the spufs coredump code.
>
> Changes since v5:
> - fix uac
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:13 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and
>> coredump code. Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are
>> those to the spufs coredump code.
>
> Ack, nice, and looks
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:13 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and
> coredump code. Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are
> those to the spufs coredump code.
Ack, nice, and looks good.
The only part I dislike is
