On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Sudeep Dutt wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:48 -0800, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
>> Thank you for the report.
>> Have you tried to compile on x86_64? Which rhel do you use? Rhel6.X?
>> MIC card is expected to work with x86_64 host, not with ppc64. We have never
>> com
Thank you for the report.
Have you tried to compile on x86_64? Which rhel do you use? Rhel6.X?
MIC card is expected to work with x86_64 host, not with ppc64. We have never
compiled on ppc host while our primary development platform was rhel6.X.
Line 92 is the first use of htole16 and MIC_VRING_EN
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:48 -0800, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
> Thank you for the report.
> Have you tried to compile on x86_64? Which rhel do you use? Rhel6.X?
> MIC card is expected to work with x86_64 host, not with ppc64. We have never
> compiled on ppc host while our primary development platform wa
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 16:48 +, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
> Thank you for the report.
> Have you tried to compile on x86_64? Which rhel do you use? Rhel6.X?
> MIC card is expected to work with x86_64 host, not with ppc64. We have never
> compiled on ppc host while our primary development platform wa
On 12/04/2014 05:57 PM, Sudeep Dutt wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:48 -0800, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
Thank you for the report.
Have you tried to compile on x86_64? Which rhel do you use? Rhel6.X?
MIC card is expected to work with x86_64 host, not with ppc64. We have never
compiled on ppc host whi
