On 04/06/2013 11:58 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:53:58PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
Third, what's the most reliable way to ensure a block of addresses around
0xf600 don't get used for shared libraries? (We want to preserve
those addresses for emulating hardware in a
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:53:58PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running with glibc 2.11 on a 2.6.34 kernel. 32-bit userspace on 64-bit
> kernel.
>
> On a complicated process the memory map looks something like this:
>
>
> 5b2c000-f5b38000 r-xp 00:0f 3636
