Re: [PATCH] cell: CONFIG_SPE_BASE is a typo (was: Re: possible dead CONFIG-related content under arch/powerpc)

2007-07-16 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 18:35 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The config symbol for SPE support is called CONFIG_SPU_BASE, not > CONFIG_SPE_BASE. Oops... Arnd, we need to check the distro kernels here. > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EM

[PATCH] cell: CONFIG_SPE_BASE is a typo (was: Re: possible dead CONFIG-related content under arch/powerpc)

2007-07-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
The config symbol for SPE support is called CONFIG_SPU_BASE, not CONFIG_SPE_BASE. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c index 4f2f453..0b25d42 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c +++ b/arch/pow

Re: possible dead CONFIG-related content under arch/powerpc

2007-07-16 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 11:16 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > == SPE_BASE == > > arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:612:#ifdef CONFIG_SPE_BASE > > arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:747:#ifdef CONFIG_SPE_BASE > > Interesting, should this

Re: possible dead CONFIG-related content under arch/powerpc

2007-07-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > == SPE_BASE == > arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:612:#ifdef CONFIG_SPE_BASE > arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:747:#ifdef CONFIG_SPE_BASE Interesting, should this one be CONFIG_SPU_BASE? With kind regards, Geert Uytterhoeven Software