On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:24:29AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is another attempt to make sure the dma_mask pointer is always
> initialized for platform devices. Not doing so lead to lots of
> boilerplate code, and makes platform devices different from all our
> major busse
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs
> > to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them.
>
> I have a respun version rea
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:25:31PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs
> > to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them.
>
> I have
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs
> to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them.
I have a respun version ready, but I'd really like to hear some
comments from usb de
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:05:14AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is another attempt to make sure the dma_mask pointer is always
> initialized for platform devices. Not doing so lead to lots of
> boilerplate code, and makes platform devices different from all our
> major busse
