Re: next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices v2

2019-08-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:24:29AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this is another attempt to make sure the dma_mask pointer is always > initialized for platform devices. Not doing so lead to lots of > boilerplate code, and makes platform devices different from all our > major busse

Re: next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices

2019-08-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs > > to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them. > > I have a respun version rea

Re: next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices

2019-08-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:25:31PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs > > to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them. > > I have

Re: next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices

2019-08-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs > to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them. I have a respun version ready, but I'd really like to hear some comments from usb de

Re: next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices

2019-08-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:05:14AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this is another attempt to make sure the dma_mask pointer is always > initialized for platform devices. Not doing so lead to lots of > boilerplate code, and makes platform devices different from all our > major busse