On 04/21/2015 12:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>Ok, then define a new Kconfig option that merge_config.sh will look for.
> So in p1_defconfig, there will be this line:
>
>CONFIG_OTHER_DEFCONFIGS=fsl_basic_config
If you want to do that go ahead. In the meantime we'll use the
mechanism that alread
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 13:11 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 12:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Ok, then define a new Kconfig option that merge_config.sh will look for.
> >> > So in p1_defconfig, there will be this line:
> >> >
> >> >CONFIG_OTHER_DEFCONFIGS=fsl_basic_config
> > If y
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 08:25 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
> > We want single-name config targets to still work from the user's
> > perspective, but we want to reduce the (often imperfect) duplication
> > under the hood.
>
> Ok, then define a new Kconfig option that merge_config.sh w
Scott Wood wrote:
We want single-name config targets to still work from the user's
perspective, but we want to reduce the (often imperfect) duplication
under the hood.
Ok, then define a new Kconfig option that merge_config.sh will look for.
So in p1_defconfig, there will be this line:
CONFI
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 22:42 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Why do you need a powerpc-specific way to use merge_config.sh? Other
> >> >architectures have the same problem with defconfigs.
>
> > What are you perceiving as "powerpc-specific" about what we're
> > proposing?
Scott Wood wrote:
>
>Why do you need a powerpc-specific way to use merge_config.sh? Other
>architectures have the same problem with defconfigs.
What are you perceiving as "powerpc-specific" about what we're
proposing?
Well, there's the subject of this thread, which is "new way of writing
d
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 21:02 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> >
> > The ability to merge configs is already there. We're just talking about
> > using that functionality.
>
> Why do you need a powerpc-specific way to use merge_config.sh? Other
>
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 21:02 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> >
> > The ability to merge configs is already there. We're just talking about
> > using that functionality.
>
> Why do you need a powerpc-specific way to use merge_config.sh? Other
>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>
> The ability to merge configs is already there. We're just talking about
> using that functionality.
Why do you need a powerpc-specific way to use merge_config.sh? Other
architectures have the same problem with defconfigs.
Besides, wouldn
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 08:46 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Lijun Pan wrote:
>
> > Have just sent out a patch considering the previous discussion.
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/462249/
> > [PATCH] powerpc/defconfig: new way of writing defconfig
>
> The abilit
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Lijun Pan wrote:
> Have just sent out a patch considering the previous discussion.
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/462249/
> [PATCH] powerpc/defconfig: new way of writing defconfig
The ability to merge defconfigs is a feature that's been requested by
many pe
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Cochran [mailto:p...@mindchasers.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 8:21 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421; Pan Lijun-B44306
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> Subject: Re: new way of writing defconfigs for freescale&#
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 1:53 PM
> To: Pan Lijun-B44306
> Cc: Michael Ellerman; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> Subject: Re: new way of writing defconfigs for freescale's powerpc platforms
>
.@ozlabs.org; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> > Subject: Re: new way of writing defconfigs for freescale's powerpc platforms
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 10:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > &
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Ellerman [mailto:m...@ellerman.id.au]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 1:19 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: Pan Lijun-B44306; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> Subject: Re: new way of writing defconfigs for freescale&#
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 10:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 21:52 +, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > > Hi Maintainers,
> > >
> > > We have a proposal for writing the defconfigs for freescale's powperpc
> > > platforms in a n
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 10:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 21:52 +, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > Hi Maintainers,
> >
> > We have a proposal for writing the defconfigs for freescale's powperpc
> > platforms in a new way.
> > Can you take a look and provide some feedback?
> >
>
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 21:52 +, Lijun Pan wrote:
> Hi Maintainers,
>
> We have a proposal for writing the defconfigs for freescale's powperpc
> platforms in a new way.
> Can you take a look and provide some feedback?
>
> You know currently we have mpc85xx_defconfig, corenet32_defconfig,
> bs
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 00:44 -0400, Bob Cochran wrote:
> As you probably know, Freescale makes use of the Yocto Project build
> system for its SDK and submits patches to the SDK at a public
> meta-fsl-ppc repo at http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-ppc/
>
> I have seen some kernel
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 5:31 PM
> To: Pan Lijun-B44306
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> Subject: Re: new way of writing defconfigs for freescale's powerpc platforms
>
> On Thu, 2
On 04/16/2015 12:44 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
On 04/09/2015 06:31 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 16:52 -0500, Pan Lijun-B44306 wrote:
Hi Maintainers,
We have a proposal for writing the defconfigs for freescale's
powperpc platforms in a new way.
Can you take a look and provide some fe
On 04/09/2015 06:31 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 16:52 -0500, Pan Lijun-B44306 wrote:
Hi Maintainers,
We have a proposal for writing the defconfigs for freescale's powperpc
platforms in a new way.
Can you take a look and provide some feedback?
You know currently we have mpc85xx
22 matches
Mail list logo
