Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2023-02-03 Thread Jingbo Xu
Hi, Sorry for digging... This patch series seems useful for fs developers. I'm not sure its current status and why it doesn't get merged. On 3/9/21 11:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark

Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2021-03-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:45AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. > > > > It then adds a new alloc

Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2021-03-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:54:52PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. > > > > It the

Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2021-03-09 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. > > It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode > file system super block, thus r

Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful

2021-03-09 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. > > It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode > file system super