Hi,
Sorry for digging...
This patch series seems useful for fs developers. I'm not sure its
current status and why it doesn't get merged.
On 3/9/21 11:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to
> alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:45AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to
> > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock.
> >
> > It then adds a new alloc
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:54:52PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to
> > alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock.
> >
> > It the
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to
> alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock.
>
> It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode
> file system super block, thus r
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to
> alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock.
>
> It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode
> file system super