Re: Re: fsl upm NAND Flash issue without GPIO chip handler

2010-01-20 Thread nanda
my response inlined.. On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:41:25 +0530 wrote >nanda wrote: > > We had merged the 2.6.24 That's pretty old... >> We were using 2.6.24 as this kernel version this is the references used by >> us for MPC8321E. > with the FSL based NAND driver, Which one? Which chip are you usi

Re: fsl upm NAND Flash issue without GPIO chip handler

2010-01-20 Thread Scott Wood
nanda wrote: my response inlined.. On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:41:25 +0530 wrote >nanda wrote: > > We had merged the 2.6.24 That's pretty old... >> We were using 2.6.24 as this kernel version this is the references used by us for MPC8321E. > with the FSL based NAND driver, Which one? Which c

Re: fsl upm NAND Flash issue without GPIO chip handler

2010-01-19 Thread Scott Wood
nanda wrote: We had merged the 2.6.24 That's pretty old... with the FSL based NAND driver, Which one? Which chip are you using, and how is NAND attached to it? we observed that gpio library is mandatory to be included. We have not included the gpios configured in the dts file as the we