On Wednesday 27 April 2016 12:19:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > Right, so we could skip patches 5 and 6, and instead remove the two
> > headers as we remove the driver. Let's see what the architecture
> > maintainers think about it, at least powerpc actually enables gen_rtc
> > in its defconf
Hi Arnd,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 11:44:10 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 26/04/2016 at 23:44:04 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> > I've had these patches in my tree for a while, after the first one
>> > had a few issues that are fixed in
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 11:44:10 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 26/04/2016 at 23:44:04 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> > I've had these patches in my tree for a while, after the first one
> > had a few issues that are fixed in this new version. The old-style
> > PC RTC driver is now also disabled
On 26/04/2016 at 23:44:04 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> I've had these patches in my tree for a while, after the first one
> had a few issues that are fixed in this new version. The old-style
> PC RTC driver is now also disabled on m68k (as pointed out by
> Geert), ppc (it was also blacklisted), a
Hi Arnd,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:54:41 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > For the genrtc driver, rearranging the headers makes it simpler
>> > to use and reduces duplication. In c
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:54:41 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > For the genrtc driver, rearranging the headers makes it simpler
> > to use and reduces duplication. In case of alpha and mn10300,
> > I've shown that the genrtc
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> For the genrtc driver, rearranging the headers makes it simpler
> to use and reduces duplication. In case of alpha and mn10300,
> I've shown that the genrtc and rtc drivers are doing the same
> thing, so we don't need them both. Th
