On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > > Just as an extra note, the file drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c is m68k only,
> > > so you should probably leave that alone as well. It probably doesn't need
On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:
>> Just as an extra note, the file drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c is
>> m68k only,
>> so you should probably leave that alone as well. It probably
>> doesn't need
>> that header, but the change should
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:
> Just as an extra note, the file drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c is m68k only,
> so you should probably leave that alone as well. It probably doesn't need
> that header, but the change should really come from the 68k side of things.
Thanks, it's indeed not neede
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:16:03PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:33 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> >> My analysis of usage:
> >>
> >> ./drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c:#include remove
> >> ./drivers/char/vme_scc.c:#include 68k only
> >> ./drivers/char/serial167.c:#include
On Aug 23, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:47:57PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>>> ./drivers/mtd/maps/tqm834x.c:#include
>>> ./drivers/mtd/maps/pq2fads.c:#include
>>
>> Although these both have an extern of type bd_t (defined in
>> ppcboot.h), afaict they don't
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:47:57PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > ./drivers/mtd/maps/tqm834x.c:#include
> > ./drivers/mtd/maps/pq2fads.c:#include
>
> Although these both have an extern of type bd_t (defined in
> ppcboot.h), afaict they don't actually use it, so these should be
> removable.
They
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:33 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:33:55PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
> >>> following lists an
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:33 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:33:55PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
>>> following lists and determining if we have an
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:33:55PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> >Guys,
> >
> >I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
> >following lists and determining if we have an issue or not related
> >the following files:
> >
> >Getti
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
> following lists and determining if we have an issue or not related
> the following files:
>
> Getting some classification on these would be good. Possibly
> classifications,
On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:47 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:19:21AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
>> following lists and determining if we have an issue or not related
>> the following files:
>>
>> Getting so
On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:49 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:30:47PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:19:21 -0500
>> Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
>>> following lists and d
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:30:47PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:19:21 -0500
> Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
> > following lists and determining if we have an issue or not related
> >
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:19:21AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
> following lists and determining if we have an issue or not related
> the following files:
>
> Getting some classification on these would be good. Possibly
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:19:21 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was wondering if I could get your help with looking at the
> following lists and determining if we have an issue or not related
> the following files:
>
> Getting some classification on these would be good
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:19:21AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> ./drivers/mtd/maps/tqm834x.c:#include
> ./drivers/mtd/maps/pq2fads.c:#include
These use the bd_t, and thus will only work on arch/ppc. On
arch/powerpc, we can use the device tree to specify the mapping.
-Scott
__
16 matches
Mail list logo