On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> USB is not working my hardware, so I booted my Efika and it's not
>>> working
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> USB is not working my hardware, so I booted my Efika and it's not
>> working there either. This is with linus' current git.
>>
>> Can anyone verify this?
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
This is what we were recommended to use at the time. There is a patch
on www.powerdeveloper.org which tweaks the tree to make it ultra-compliant
with the Linux version of things, which implements every variation. It
also implements a suggested patch which added a "bi
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:46 +0200, Carsten Schlote wrote:
>
>
> The framebuffer use-case is currently the only one, where such a
> hardware-swapper could be really useful. But still the drivers would
> have to know about this feature, it would require query/set macros/fcts
> for endian translatio
Hi Ben,
> Note about the Amiga stuff: it's a bad idea :-) Every attempt
> at "magically" fixing endian in HW is a recipe for tears and
> disasters.
I fully agree. It's one of the problem I encountered with some similiar
approach on some other big-endian Freescale CPU. It is implemented as a
har
> This is what we were recommended to use at the time. There is a patch
> on www.powerdeveloper.org which tweaks the tree to make it ultra-compliant
> with the Linux version of things, which implements every variation. It
> also implements a suggested patch which added a "big-endian" property
> (n
Jon Smirl wrote:
Efika has this:
compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-ohci","fsl,mpc5200-ohci";
It doesn't :D
My system, running production firmware, says
ohci-bigendian,ohci-be,mpc5200-ohci,mpc5200-usb
This is what we were recommended to use at the time. There is a patch
on www.powerdeveloper.org w
David Gibson wrote:
This, of course, is exactly why I *don't* recommend embedded platforms
move to including the device tree in the flashed firmware. Keeping
the device tree in the bootwrapper means that it *is* updated with the
kernel and we don't have to mess around with as much backwards
co
..wasn't the real issue for the device tree to get the firmware right?
R&B
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:12 PM, David Gibson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:43:29PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 28,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:43:29PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:30:56PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> > >
> > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 05:04:22PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:14:18AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> Shouldn't the driver already know it is being used on a BE machine?
> >
> > No. Endianness of the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:14:18AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> Shouldn't the driver already know it is being used on a BE machine?
>
> No. Endianness of the CPU is not necessarily the same as the endianness
> of device registe
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:14:18AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Shouldn't the driver already know it is being used on a BE machine?
No. Endianness of the CPU is not necessarily the same as the endianness
of device registers.
For example, PCI OHCI on a big-endian host.
-Scott
__
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
>> This, of course, is exactly why I *don't* recommend embedded platforms
>> move to including the device tree in the flashed firmware. Keeping
>> the device tree in the bootwrapper means that it *is* updated with the
>> kernel and
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:43:29PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:30:56PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> >
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Last time I noticed it was working was about ten days ago. I don't use
>
> "Jon" == Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Jon> Can u-boot handle the wrapped DTB? I'm using a pointer to kernel
Jon> and one to DTB when booting from u-boot.
>>
>> See my recent (nacked by Wolfgang, but sane in principle) patch for
>> uImage. support:
>>
>> http://patchwor
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Jon" == Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Jon> How do I adjust my build to put the DTB into a wrapper? I'm
> Jon> based on the pcm030 makefile and it assumes the DTB is built
> Jon> externally.
>
> "Jon" == Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Jon> How do I adjust my build to put the DTB into a wrapper? I'm
Jon> based on the pcm030 makefile and it assumes the DTB is built
Jon> externally.
Jon> Can u-boot handle the wrapped DTB? I'm using a pointer to kernel
Jon> and one to
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:43 PM, David Gibson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:30:56PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
>>
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Last time I noticed it was working was about ten days ago. I don
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:30:56PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
Last time I noticed it was working was about ten days ago. I don't use
it everyday.
>>> Efika is broken because of this:
>>>
>>> ohci-ppc-o
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
Last time I noticed it was working was about ten days ago. I don't use
it everyday.
Efika is broken because of this:
ohci-ppc-of.c...
is_bigendian =
of_device_is_compatible(dn, "ohci-bige
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > USB is not working my hardware, so I booted my Efika and it's not
>> > working there
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > USB is not working my hardware, so I booted my Efika and it's not
> > working there either. This is with linus' current git.
> >
> > Can anyone verify this? Or know what
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> USB is not working my hardware, so I booted my Efika and it's not
> working there either. This is with linus' current git.
>
> Can anyone verify this? Or know what happened to USB?
> USB is loading but it is not finding anythi
24 matches
Mail list logo
