Re: State of PREEMPT_RT in PPC arch

2010-02-19 Thread Ryan
Hi Wolfram, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > The list was apropriate. As all people are busy by default, getting no > response > is not that exceptional. If you need a fast response, you should consider > commercial support. I appreciate your comments. -Ryan. _

Re: State of PREEMPT_RT in PPC arch

2010-02-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:34:28PM -0800, Ryan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > I'm soliciting comments from the community. Thanks in advance for > > > sharing your thoughts. > > > > Mainline your driver and you are free from such problems :) > > Shouldn't i

Re: State of PREEMPT_RT in PPC arch

2010-02-18 Thread Ryan
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I'm soliciting comments from the community. Thanks in advance for > > sharing your thoughts. > > Mainline your driver and you are free from such problems :) Shouldn't it be the opposite way? That is, get drivers working first then mainlin

Re: State of PREEMPT_RT in PPC arch

2010-02-18 Thread Wolfram Sang
> I'm soliciting comments from the community. Thanks in advance for > sharing your thoughts. Mainline your driver and you are free from such problems :) -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutron