Hi Ben,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:52:31AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 17:38 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
> > Thanks Ben for taking a look at this. So I checked the rtas messages
> > on
> > the serial console and see the following:
> >
> > instantiating rtas at 0x000
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 17:38 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
> Thanks Ben for taking a look at this. So I checked the rtas messages
> on
> the serial console and see the following:
>
> instantiating rtas at 0x0f632000... done
>
> Which does not correspond to the higher addresses that I see as
>
Hi Ben,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:04:24PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:53 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
> >
> > With some debugging I found that that section has reserved pages. On
> > instrumenting the memblock_reserve() and reserve_bootmem() routines, I can
> >
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:53 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
>
> With some debugging I found that that section has reserved pages. On
> instrumenting the memblock_reserve() and reserve_bootmem() routines, I can see
> that many of the memory areas are reserved for kernel and initrd by the
> memblock reser
