Re: RapidIO: multiple mport support for QorIQ

2010-12-15 Thread Thomas Taranowski
I actually take most of this back, it looks like there is a path available so as not to fork the driver for the pseries. Thomas Taranowski Certified netburner consultant baringforge.com On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Thomas Taranowski wrote: >> >>> There is some divergance in respect to th

Re: RapidIO: multiple mport support for QorIQ

2010-12-15 Thread Thomas Taranowski
> >> There is some divergance in respect to the memory map that is non-trivial >> that >> I'm not sure how to handle, since it totally hoses the common fsl_rio.c >> structures. >> I think I want to create a new set that's p2020 specific, but has potential >> to be >> shared with the other QorIQ

RE: RapidIO: multiple mport support for QorIQ

2010-12-15 Thread Bounine, Alexandre
Thomas Taranowski wrote: > I'm planning to add support for the multiple(2) mports supported by > the Freescale p2020 processor. I'm currently looking at the fsl layer > to add in support for multiple port enumeration, and work up from > there. It looks like the upper layers already have at leas

RE: RapidIO: multiple mport support for QorIQ

2010-12-15 Thread Li Yang-R58472
> Subject: RapidIO: multiple mport support for QorIQ > > I'm planning to add support for the multiple(2) mports supported by the > Freescale > p2020 processor. I'm currently looking at the fsl layer to add in support for > multiple port enumeration, and work up from there. It looks like the upp