On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 22:58 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 01 October 2007 10:00:02 Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:16 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > >
> > > Ah, forgot to say.
> > > It does not crash immediately when the register is written. It takes
> > > abo
On Monday 01 October 2007 10:00:02 Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:16 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> >
> > Ah, forgot to say.
> > It does not crash immediately when the register is written. It takes about
> > two seconds
> > to crash. And when the machine is colder to begin wit
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:16 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> Ah, forgot to say.
> It does not crash immediately when the register is written. It takes about
> two seconds
> to crash. And when the machine is colder to begin with, it takes slightly
> longer to trigger. That _might_ support your ov
On Sunday 30 September 2007 12:13:36 Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Sunday 30 September 2007 00:49:05 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Well, it's possible that they have a too weak pull-up resistor on those
> > lines, and thus when asserted to 0, a significant current goes through
> > causing the whol
On Sunday 30 September 2007 00:49:05 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Well, it's possible that they have a too weak pull-up resistor on those
> lines, and thus when asserted to 0, a significant current goes through
> causing the whole thing to heat up. That heat added to the residual heat
> of a hot
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 00:26 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Sunday 30 September 2007 00:19:53 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This all smells to me like a silicon bug, so I'd start searching
> > > in the silicon erratas. But I'm not sure, of course. It's also strange
> > > that i
On Sunday 30 September 2007 00:19:53 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >
> > This all smells to me like a silicon bug, so I'd start searching
> > in the silicon erratas. But I'm not sure, of course. It's also strange
> > that it depends on temperature. (That's why I first expected the PMU
> > wou
>
> This all smells to me like a silicon bug, so I'd start searching
> in the silicon erratas. But I'm not sure, of course. It's also strange
> that it depends on temperature. (That's why I first expected the PMU
> would cause this).
>
> Thanks for your help.
Could be that we are creating a sho
On Saturday 29 September 2007 23:51:55 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:22 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 September 2007 13:06:59 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > This is very strange... Can you try also clearing VGA_DDC_CLK_OUT_EN and
> > > > VGA_DDC_DATA_O
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:22 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 29 September 2007 13:06:59 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > This is very strange... Can you try also clearing VGA_DDC_CLK_OUT_EN and
> > > VGA_DDC_DATA_OUT_EN and the same time and see if that helps ?
> >
> > It still triggers the
On Saturday 29 September 2007 13:06:59 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > This is very strange... Can you try also clearing VGA_DDC_CLK_OUT_EN and
> > VGA_DDC_DATA_OUT_EN and the same time and see if that helps ?
>
> It still triggers the bug then.
I tried something else.
I removed the write and only adde
On Saturday 29 September 2007 01:04:13 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 23:32 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > some time ago I already mailed you about this problem.
> > I will quickly describe what's going on, again:
> >
> > My powerbook boots fine when it's c
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 23:32 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some time ago I already mailed you about this problem.
> I will quickly describe what's going on, again:
>
> My powerbook boots fine when it's cold. You can work with
> it and you can also run it hot (compile something, etc...).
13 matches
Mail list logo
