Hi Ben !
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:46:09 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
...
> Hrm, I get a merge conflicts with spi-mpc512x-psc.c, please check that I
> fixed it up properly in powerpc-next and let me know.
your fix is correct.
Thanks,
Anatolij
__
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 18:46 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 17:00 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 06:46 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > > Hi Ben !
> > >
> > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:18:59 +0100
> > > Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 17:00 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 06:46 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > Hi Ben !
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:18:59 +0100
> > Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ben !
> > >
> > > please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.14:
> >
> > Pi
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:00:14 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 06:46 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > Hi Ben !
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:18:59 +0100
> > Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ben !
> > >
> > > please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.14:
> >
> >
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 06:46 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Ben !
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:18:59 +0100
> Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben !
> >
> > please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.14:
>
> Ping.
Oops, you sent that while I was on vacation and I missed it.
Next time, try to se
Hi Ben !
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:18:59 +0100
Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Ben !
>
> please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.14:
Ping.
> Switch mpc512x to the common clock framework and adapt mpc512x
> drivers to use the new clock driver. Old PPC_CLOCK code is
> removed entirely since there are no
On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:50:48 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
...
> Thanks. BTW. Next time, any chance you can base this off the same point
> in Linus tree where my next branch is based ? Or base of my next
> branch :-)
Okay, I will base of your next branch.
Thanks,
Anatolij
___
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 22:39 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Ben !
>
> Please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.12.
>
> There are cleanups for some mpc5121 specific drivers and DTS files
> in preparation to switch mpc5121 clock support to a clock driver
> based on common clock framework. Additiona
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:29:02 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
...
> > The server should be up, a recent test pull succeeded here. Could you
> > please try again?
>
> Just a fluke indeed, works now. Pulled & pushed.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Anatolij
___
Linu
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:00 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:46:01 +1000
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 00:36 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > > Hi Ben !
> > >
> > > Please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.11. There are small cleanups
> > > an
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:00 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:46:01 +1000
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 00:36 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > > Hi Ben !
> > >
> > > Please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.11. There are small cleanups
> > > an
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:46:01 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 00:36 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > Hi Ben !
> >
> > Please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.11. There are small cleanups
> > and fixes for mpc512x common code, mpc512x_defconfig updates and
> > soft reboo
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 00:36 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Ben !
>
> Please pull mpc5xxx patches for v3.11. There are small cleanups
> and fixes for mpc512x common code, mpc512x_defconfig updates and
> soft reboot support for mpc5125 based boards.
Looks like your server is down...
Cheers,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> A few patches from Suzie for 47x kexec/kdump support, and some MSI patches
> from Mai La.
>
> josh
>
> The following changes since commit ec34a6814988f17506733c1e8b058ce46602591d:
>
> powerpc: Remove old powerpc specific ptrace getre
Hi Anatolij,
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:18:30 +0100 Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
> Yes. Stephen, could you please change linux-next to pull from my
> mpc5xxx tree
>
> git://git.denx.de/linux-2.6-agust.git next
I have replaced the 52xx-and-virtex tree with this (and called it simply
mpc5xxx). I hav
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:30:17 +0100
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > powerpc/mpc52xx: setup port_config and CDM settings through DT
>
> Can we skip this patch for 3.5? Between posting it and pushing it upstream
> were
> about 24 hours, so one didn't have much chance of reviewing (and
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:32:21 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
...
> Anatolij, Can you organize with Stephen (CC) so that you tree is part of
> linux-next for the next cycle ? Either that or make sure you send me
> pull requests really early :-)
Yes. Stephen, could you please change linux-next
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 23:30 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > powerpc/mpc52xx: setup port_config and CDM settings through DT
>
> Can we skip this patch for 3.5? Between posting it and pushing it upstream
> were
> about 24 hours, so one didn't have much chance of reviewing (and no linu
Hi,
> powerpc/mpc52xx: setup port_config and CDM settings through DT
Can we skip this patch for 3.5? Between posting it and pushing it upstream were
about 24 hours, so one didn't have much chance of reviewing (and no linux-next
exposure).
I think the bindings leave space for questions, e.g
Hi Josh,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:41:38 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> Stephen, could you change linux-next to pull from this tree instead of the
> infradead one?
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpUVjCAS2Rb6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> This is the relocatable series from Suzie that has been brewing for quite a
> while. I also included a small fix for currituck that I hit when I was
> building
> various kernels.
>
> NOTE: To build anything config that includes th
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:14:52 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> Stephen, can you switch the linux-next tree to use this instead?
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.infradead.org/users/jwboyer/powerpc-4xx.git next
I have switched to that now.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwel
Hello Grant,
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Grant,
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:49:07 -0500 Grant wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2011 4:31 AM, "Anatolij Gustschin" wrote:
Hi Ben,
please pull another two mpc5xxx patches for next. These patches were
queued in Grant's 'powerpc/next' branch a
Hello Grant,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:49:07 -0500 Grant wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2011 4:31 AM, "Anatolij Gustschin" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > please pull another two mpc5xxx patches for next. These patches were
> > > queued in Grant's 'powerpc/next' branch a while ago, but a pull request
>
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:49:07 -0500
Grant Likely wrote:
...
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://git.denx.de/linux-2.6-agust.git next
> >
> > Grant Likely (1):
> > powerpc/5200: add support for charon board
>
> Hmmm, I didn't actually write this patch. It looks li
On Sep 29, 2011 4:31 AM, "Anatolij Gustschin" wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> please pull another two mpc5xxx patches for next. These patches were
> queued in Grant's 'powerpc/next' branch a while ago, but a pull request
> have never been submitted for them. Thanks!
>
> Anatolij
>
> The following changes s
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 01:20 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> please pull some mpc5xxx updates and mpc8xxx/512x gpio driver
> move patches for next.
Thanks, pulled & pushed out to github.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Anatolij
>
> The following changes since commit a120db06c3f435c37d028b6e5a1968
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 09:05 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Finally somewhat caught up. Now that -rc1 is out, here are some
> > patches for the next merge window.
> >
> > josh
> >
> > The following changes since commit 53d1e658df6e
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Finally somewhat caught up. Now that -rc1 is out, here are some
> patches for the next merge window.
>
> josh
>
> The following changes since commit 53d1e658df6e26d62500410719aaee2b82067c03:
>
> Merge branch 'devicetree/merge' of
>
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 09:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Josh Boyer
> wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > A few fixes from Tony/Dave, a DTS update from Stefan, and a MAINTAINERS
> > update.
> >
> > josh
> >
> > The following changes since commit af9719c3062dfe216a0c3de3fa52b
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> A few fixes from Tony/Dave, a DTS update from Stefan, and a MAINTAINERS
> update.
>
> josh
>
> The following changes since commit af9719c3062dfe216a0c3de3fa52be6d22b4456c:
>
> powerpc: Use -mtraceback=no (2011-07-01 13:49:27 +1000)
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>Hi Ben,
>
>Please pull the 'next' branch of the 4xx tree. These commits have been
>sitting there for a while and I wanted to get them into your branch
>before tackling the latest round of 476 stuff from Shaggy.
Ben, I don't see any of t
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:56:15AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 09:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:09:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >Hi Ben,
>> >
>> >A few small updates for the next branch. A new board/SoC from AMCC, and
>> >some 476 cha
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 09:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:09:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >Hi Ben,
> >
> >A few small updates for the next branch. A new board/SoC from AMCC, and
> >some 476 changes from Shaggy. Please pull.
>
> OK, below is a fixed up tree that drops t
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:09:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>Hi Ben,
>
>A few small updates for the next branch. A new board/SoC from AMCC, and
>some 476 changes from Shaggy. Please pull.
OK, below is a fixed up tree that drops the patch Shaggy said was
broken, and rebases on top of your new -ne
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:54:53PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>Hi Ben,
>
>Two more quick patches from me for -next. Stefrano's is the Katmai usage of
>the reset type change that just went in. The 460SX PCI-e patch has been
>sitting
>for a while and seems to have been skipped over.
I've updated my
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 08:49 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:55:19PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree to get the following
> >> commits.
> >>
> >> I have some othe
On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:55:19PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi Ben,
Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree to get the following
commits.
I have some other things in the middle of being worked that may or
may not
make it in time for the
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:55:19PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>Hi Ben,
>
>Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree to get the following commits.
>
>I have some other things in the middle of being worked that may or may not
>make it in time for the next release, so I wanted to get these commits int
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 08:25 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:08:00AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >Hi Ben,
> >
> >Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree. It has a few small commits
> >for 2.6.30, as well as the 256K page size patch for 44x.
>
> Ben, ping?
It's up now.
Ch
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:08:00AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>Hi Ben,
>
>Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree. It has a few small commits
>for 2.6.30, as well as the 256K page size patch for 44x.
Ben, ping?
josh
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linu
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree. It has a few small commits
>
> Any chance we can get the fix for PCI on e.g. Sequoia in?
> This is a regression from 2.6.28.
BTW, I don't see the patch on
http
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Please pull the next branch of the 4xx tree. It has a few small commits
Any chance we can get the fix for PCI on e.g. Sequoia in?
This is a regression from 2.6.28.
> for 2.6.30, as well as the 256K page size patch for 44x.
(Oops, this is for 2.6.30. What
Ummm, I'm batting 1000 today Please pull the **MERGE** branch of
linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git tree (The URL below was correct though).
g.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Oops, forgot to CC the mailing list.
>
> g.
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>
Oops, forgot to CC the mailing list.
g.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Here is the traditional defconfig update plus a bugfix for mpc5200
> PCI. Please pull into 2.6.29.
>
> Thanks,
> g.
>
> The following changes since commit 18e352e4a73465349711a9324767e1b24
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:14:02AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>Hi Ben,
>
>Please pull the 'next' branch of the 4xx tree to pick up what should be
>most of the remaining changes for 2.6.28. Defconfig updates will come
>after -rc1.
>
>josh
>
>The following changes since commit 6dc6472581f693b5fc95aebe
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:33:46PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> What about these? :)
>
> http://oldpatchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=20188
> (remove obsolete code from mpc52xx_phy)
I'm not going to pick this one up yet (as mentioned in my earlier
email)
> http://oldpatchwork.ozlabs
Hello Grant,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Wolfram Sang (1):
> powerpc/mpc5200: trivial printk-fixes in mpc52xx_common
Thanks.
What about these? :)
http://oldpatchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=20188
(remove obsolete code from mpc52xx_phy)
h
48 matches
Mail list logo
