Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906

2016-09-08 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Am Mittwoch, 07 September 2016, 09:08:07 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > Any change to a UAPI header needs to be carefully considered and > questioned as it is always a potential userspace breakage - and in > the kernel, we're supposed to be doing our up-most to avoid > breaking userspace. > >

Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906

2016-09-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:33:20PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Thanks for reporting the problem and finding the commit that caused it. > The only thing in commit 5c01cdd2d4bc which can affect kexec_load is the > fact that struct kexec_segment has a new member. > > This is probably break

Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906

2016-09-06 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hello Tony, Am Dienstag, 06 September 2016, 15:09:37 schrieb Tony Lindgren: > Looks like commit 5c01cdd2d4bc ("kexec_file: allow skipping checksum > calculation for some segments") makes next-20160916 stop working for > me at least on ARM. > > I now get "kexec_load failed: Invalid argument error"