Re: Fix for fsl_upm

2011-11-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Rusev wrote: > patch is vs. 2.6.39, yet it applied to 3.1 > > > > Fix of UPM driver for Freescale PowerPC processors > > If Freescale LBC driver fails to initialise itself from device tree, > then internal structure is freed only but not NULL-fied. > As result fun

Re: Fix for fsl_upm

2011-10-27 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Rusev wrote: > patch is vs. 2.6.39, yet it applied to 3.1 > > > > Fix of UPM driver for Freescale PowerPC processors > > If Freescale LBC driver fails to initialise itself from device tree, > then internal structure is freed only but not NULL-fied. > As result fun