Re: Common kernel image for e300 and e500v2

2009-01-23 Thread Scott Wood
Johns Daniel wrote: Thank you for that piece of info, Scott! May I expand the question one bit, and ask whether the user-mode binaries compiled for the e300 will generally work for the e500 -- or, vice versa? Is one choice safer than the other? I know for sure that we take a big hit on float

Re: Common kernel image for e300 and e500v2

2009-01-23 Thread Johns Daniel
Thank you for that piece of info, Scott! May I expand the question one bit, and ask whether the user-mode binaries compiled for the e300 will generally work for the e500 -- or, vice versa? Is one choice safer than the other? I know for sure that we take a big hit on floating-point ops, but are th

Re: Common kernel image for e300 and e500v2

2009-01-23 Thread Scott Wood
Johns Daniel wrote: Is it possible -- and prudent -- to use a single kernel binary image for two similar boards, one based on an e300 core and the other on an e500v2 core? No, it is not possible. They use different MMUs, and the kernel does not support choosing between them at runtime. I w