I've not heard any objections. I'll be pushing my commit to my next
branch tomorrow morning.
I don't have any objections. I wonder if Sam Ravnborg responded to
Segher's patch to extend make help?
I haven't had a reply to that yet, from anyone. IIRC Sam send a
mail some time ago saying he wo
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:22:17 +1000
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer writes:
>
> > I've not heard any objections. I'll be pushing my commit to my next
> > branch tomorrow morning.
>
> I don't have any objections. I wonder if Sam Ravnborg responded to
> Segher's patch to ext
Josh Boyer writes:
> I've not heard any objections. I'll be pushing my commit to my next
> branch tomorrow morning.
I don't have any objections. I wonder if Sam Ravnborg responded to
Segher's patch to extend make help?
Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:36 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Unless someone screams loudly and has reasons why this shouldn't go
> > in,
> > the following commit should hit the 4xx next branch in the next day or
> > so.
> >
> > josh
>
>
On Apr 6, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
Unless someone screams loudly and has reasons why this shouldn't go
in,
the following commit should hit the 4xx next branch in the next day or
so.
josh
If this is acceptable to people, I'll make similar defconfig movements
for the Fr
Unless someone screams loudly and has reasons why this shouldn't go in,
These configs won't show up for "make help" anymore, which of course is
nice because that list was too long, but we need a way to get that back
since it was useful. I'll see what I can do.
Segher
