On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 10:03 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 02:45 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > Yeah please increase the bitmap size to 65536. It will only take 8KB of
> > memory,
> > which is negligible.
>
> Well, since I sent a v6 and you replied there too, I guess we
On 05/25/2016 02:45 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Guilherme,
Sorry for the very late reply, this got lost in my email filters.
No problem Michael, thanks for replying!
On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 09:36 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
On 03/25/2016 06:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
+static
Hi Guilherme,
Sorry for the very late reply, this got lost in my email filters.
On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 09:36 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 03/25/2016 06:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > +static int get_phb_number(struct device_node *dn)
> > > +{
> > > + const __be64 *prop64;
> > >
On 03/25/2016 06:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Guilherme,
Some comments below ...
Hi Michael, thanks for the comments.
+/* For dynamic PHB numbering on get_phb_number(): max number of PHBs. */
+#defineMAX_PHBS8192
Did we just make that up? It seems like a lot, but then
Hi Guilherme,
Some comments below ...
On Fri, 2016-18-03 at 21:49:06 UTC, "Guilherme G. Piccoli" wrote:
> The domain/PHB field of PCI addresses has its value obtained from a
> global variable, incremented each time a new domain (represented by
> struct pci_controller) is added on the system. The
