Re: [v1][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0

2012-12-20 Thread tiejun.chen
On 12/21/2012 02:41 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote: gdb always need to generate a single step properly to invoke a kgdb state. But with lazy interrupt, book3e can't always trigger a debug exception with a single step since the current is blocked for handli

Re: [v1][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0

2012-12-20 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote: > gdb always need to generate a single step properly to invoke > a kgdb state. But with lazy interrupt, book3e can't always > trigger a debug exception with a single step since the current > is blocked for handling those pending exception, then we m