On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 16:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:55:44 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 22:41 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > plain text document attachment
> > > (power-replace-old-style-lock-init.patch)
>
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:55:44 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 22:41 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > plain text document attachment
> > (power-replace-old-style-lock-init.patch)
> > SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED is deprecated. Init the lock array at runtime
> > inst
Hi Ben,
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:55:44 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Looks reasonable. But iseries can be a bitch, so we do need to test it
> on monday.
It should be safe as the spinlocks cannot be access until after the
following ppc_md pointer initialisations are done (and all this ha
