Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags

2016-07-28 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:35:16 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 > > Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > > > >> Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and > >> LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used > >> wh

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags

2016-07-25 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:35:16 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 > > Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > > > >> Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and > >> LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used > >> wh

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags

2016-07-25 Thread Madhavan Srinivasan
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used when updating paca->soft_enabled. This is a very nice patchset, but can this not be a new

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags

2016-07-25 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and > LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used > when updating paca->soft_enabled. This is a very nice patchset, but can this not be a new name? We use "soft enabled/disabled" everywhere for it.