On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 17:58 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hi Mikey,
>
> On 09/17/2018 10:29 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 16:40 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > Now the transaction reclaims happens very earlier in the trap handler, and
> > > it is impossible to know precisely
Hi Mikey,
On 09/17/2018 10:29 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 16:40 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Now the transaction reclaims happens very earlier in the trap handler, and
>> it is impossible to know precisely, at that early time, what should be set
>> as the failure cause for
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 16:40 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Now the transaction reclaims happens very earlier in the trap handler, and
> it is impossible to know precisely, at that early time, what should be set
> as the failure cause for some specific cases, as, if the task will be
> rescheduled, thu
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 16:40 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Now the transaction reclaims happens very earlier in the trap handler, and
> it is impossible to know precisely, at that early time, what should be set
> as the failure cause for some specific cases, as, if the task will be
> rescheduled, thu
This series is not bisectable because this patch fails with:
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c:993:13: error: ‘tm_fix_failure_cause’ defined but
not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static void tm_fix_failure_cause(struct task_struct *task, uint8_t cause)
^
cc1: all warnings being treated
