"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
> On 5/14/19 9:45 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> [ add Keith who was looking at something similar ]
>>
...
>>
>> If it's reserved then we should not be accessing, even if the above
>> works in practice. Isn't the fix something more like this to fix up
>> the assumptions
On 5/14/19 9:45 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
[ add Keith who was looking at something similar ]
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:54 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
When we initialize the namespace, if we support altmap, we don't initialize all
the
backing struct page where as while releasing the namespace we
[ add Keith who was looking at something similar ]
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:54 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
>
> When we initialize the namespace, if we support altmap, we don't initialize
> all the
> backing struct page where as while releasing the namespace we look at some of
> these uninitilize
On 05/14/2019 08:23 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> When we initialize the namespace, if we support altmap, we don't initialize
> all the
> backing struct page where as while releasing the namespace we look at some of
> these uninitilized struct page. This results in a kernel crash as below.
Yes thi
